IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0171472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social networks and inference about unknown events: A case of the match between Google’s AlphaGo and Sedol Lee

Author

Listed:
  • Jonghoon Bae
  • Young-Jae Cha
  • Hyungsuk Lee
  • Boyun Lee
  • Sojung Baek
  • Semin Choi
  • Dayk Jang

Abstract

This study examines whether the way that a person makes inferences about unknown events is associated with his or her social relations, more precisely, those characterized by ego network density that reflects the structure of a person’s immediate social relation. From the analysis of individual predictions over the Go match between AlphaGo and Sedol Lee in March 2016 in Seoul, Korea, this study shows that the low-density group scored higher than the high-density group in the accuracy of the prediction over a future state of a social event, i.e., the outcome of the first game. We corroborated this finding with three replication tests that asked the participants to predict the following: film awards, President Park’s impeachment in Korea, and the counterfactual assessment of the US presidential election. Taken together, this study suggests that network density is negatively associated with vision advantage, i.e., the ability to discover and forecast an unknown aspect of a social event.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonghoon Bae & Young-Jae Cha & Hyungsuk Lee & Boyun Lee & Sojung Baek & Semin Choi & Dayk Jang, 2017. "Social networks and inference about unknown events: A case of the match between Google’s AlphaGo and Sedol Lee," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0171472
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0171472
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0171472&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0171472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0171472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.