IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0166774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whole Body Vibration Treatments in Postmenopausal Women Can Improve Bone Mineral Density: Results of a Stimulus Focussed Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Fratini
  • Tecla Bonci
  • Anthony M J Bull

Abstract

Whole body vibration treatment is a non-pharmacological intervention intended to stimulate muscular response and increase bone mineral density, particularly for postmenopausal women. The literature related to this topic is controversial, heterogeneous, and unclear despite the prospect of a major clinical effect.The aim of this study was to identify and systematically review the literature to assess the effect of whole body vibration treatments on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with a specific focus on the experimental factors that influence the stimulus. Nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 527 postmenopausal women and different vibration delivery designs. Cumulative dose, amplitudes and frequency of treatments as well as subject posture during treatment vary widely among studies. Some of the studies included an associated exercise training regime. Both randomized and controlled clinical trials were included. Whole body vibration was shown to produce significant BMD improvements on the hip and spine when compared to no intervention. Conversely, treatment associated with exercise training resulted in negligible outcomes when compared to exercise training or to placebo. Moreover, side-alternating platforms were more effective in improving BMD values than synchronous platforms and mechanical oscillations of magnitude higher than 3 g and/or frequency lower than 25 Hz were also found to be effective. Treatments with a cumulative dose over 1000 minutes in the follow-up period were correlated to positive outcomes.Our conclusion is that whole body vibration treatments in elderly women can reduce BMD decline.However, many factors (e.g., amplitude, frequency and subject posture) affect the capacity of the vibrations to propagate to the target site; the adequate level of stimulation required to produce these effects has not yet been defined. Further biomechanical analyses to predict the propagation of the vibration waves along the body and assess the stimulation levels are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Fratini & Tecla Bonci & Anthony M J Bull, 2016. "Whole Body Vibration Treatments in Postmenopausal Women Can Improve Bone Mineral Density: Results of a Stimulus Focussed Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0166774
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166774
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166774&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0166774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamad Alshurafa & Matthias Briel & Elie A Akl & Ted Haines & Paul Moayyedi & Stephen J Gentles & Lorena Rios & Chau Tran & Neera Bhatnagar & Francois Lamontagne & Stephen D Walter & Gordon H Guyatt, 2012. "Inconsistent Definitions for Intention-To-Treat in Relation to Missing Outcome Data: Systematic Review of the Methods Literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin Rudolf & Lea A. L. Dejonghe & Ingo Froböse & Florian Lammer & Lisa-Marie Rückel & Jessica Tetz & Andrea Schaller, 2019. "Effectiveness Studies in Health Promotion: A Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Reporting Significant Effects on Physical Activity in Working Age Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, March.
    2. S Swaroop Vedula & Tianjing Li & Kay Dickersin, 2013. "Differences in Reporting of Analyses in Internal Company Documents Versus Published Trial Reports: Comparisons in Industry-Sponsored Trials in Off-Label Uses of Gabapentin," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Elie A Akl & Bradley C Johnston & Pablo Alonso-Coello & Ignacio Neumann & Shanil Ebrahim & Matthias Briel & Deborah J Cook & Gordon H Guyatt, 2013. "Addressing Dichotomous Data for Participants Excluded from Trial Analysis: A Guide for Systematic Reviewers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-7, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0166774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.