IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0165309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospective, Multicentre, Nationwide Clinical Data from 600 Cases of Acute Pancreatitis

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Párniczky
  • Balázs Kui
  • Andrea Szentesi
  • Anita Balázs
  • Ákos Szűcs
  • Dóra Mosztbacher
  • József Czimmer
  • Patrícia Sarlós
  • Judit Bajor
  • Szilárd Gódi
  • Áron Vincze
  • Anita Illés
  • Imre Szabó
  • Gabriella Pár
  • Tamás Takács
  • László Czakó
  • Zoltán Szepes
  • Zoltán Rakonczay
  • Ferenc Izbéki
  • Judit Gervain
  • Adrienn Halász
  • János Novák
  • Stefan Crai
  • István Hritz
  • Csaba Góg
  • János Sümegi
  • Petra Golovics
  • Márta Varga
  • Barnabás Bod
  • József Hamvas
  • Mónika Varga-Müller
  • Zsuzsanna Papp
  • Miklós Sahin-Tóth
  • Péter Hegyi
  • on behalf of the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis (AP) in a prospectively collected, large, multicentre cohort and to validate the major recommendations in the IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of AP. Design: Eighty-six different clinical parameters were collected using an electronic clinical research form designed by the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group. Patients: 600 adult patients diagnosed with AP were prospectively enrolled from 17 Hungarian centres over a two-year period from 1 January 2013. Main Results: With respect to aetiology, biliary and alcoholic pancreatitis represented the two most common forms of AP. The prevalence of biliary AP was higher in women, whereas alcoholic AP was more common in men. Hyperlipidaemia was a risk factor for severity, lack of serum enzyme elevation posed a risk for severe AP, and lack of abdominal pain at admission demonstrated a risk for mortality. Abdominal tenderness developed in all the patients with severe AP, while lack of abdominal tenderness was a favourable sign for mortality. Importantly, lung injury at admission was associated with mortality. With regard to laboratory parameters, white blood cell count and CRP were the two most sensitive indicators for severe AP. The most common local complication was peripancreatic fluid, whereas the most common distant organ failure in severe AP was lung injury. Deviation from the recommendations in the IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines on fluid replacement, enteral nutrition and timing of interventions increased severity and mortality. Conclusions: Analysis of a large, nationwide, prospective cohort of AP cases allowed for the identification of important determinants of severity and mortality. Evidence-based guidelines should be observed rigorously to improve outcomes in AP.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Párniczky & Balázs Kui & Andrea Szentesi & Anita Balázs & Ákos Szűcs & Dóra Mosztbacher & József Czimmer & Patrícia Sarlós & Judit Bajor & Szilárd Gódi & Áron Vincze & Anita Illés & Imre Szabó , 2016. "Prospective, Multicentre, Nationwide Clinical Data from 600 Cases of Acute Pancreatitis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0165309
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0165309
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0165309&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0165309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Gao & Hong-Xia Yang & Cheng-En Ma, 2015. "The Value of BISAP Score for Predicting Mortality and Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0165309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.