IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0161937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding the Primary Care Providers in the Specialist-Dominant Primary Care Setting of Korea: A Cluster Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Yong Lee
  • Sang Jun Eun
  • Hyun Joo Kim
  • Min-Woo Jo

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to identify private clinics that have a potential to perform the role of primary care providers (PCPs) in a primary care setting in Korea where private specialists are dominant. Methods: The 2013 National Patient Sample claim data of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in Korea was used. Two-step cluster analysis was performed using characteristics of private clinics, and patient and utilization characteristics of 27,797 private clinics. External validation of clusters was performed by assessing the association among clusters and outcomes of care provided by private clinics. Stability of clusters was cross-validated using discriminant analysis. Results: The result classified more than a half of private clinics into a potential PCP cluster. These were private clinics with specialties considered to be those of primary care physicians and were more likely to be located in non-metropolitan areas than specialized PCPs were. Compared to specialized PCPs, they had a higher percentage of pediatric and geriatric patients, patients with greater disease severity, a higher percentage of patients with complex comorbidities or with simple or minor disease groups, a higher number of patients and visits, and the same or higher quality of primary care. The most important factor in explaining variations between PCP clusters was the number of simple or minor disease groups per patient. Conclusion: This study identified potential PCPs and suggested the identifying criteria for PCPs. It will provide useful information for formulation of a primary care strengthening policy to policy makers in Korea as well as other countries with similar specialist-dominant primary care settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Yong Lee & Sang Jun Eun & Hyun Joo Kim & Min-Woo Jo, 2016. "Finding the Primary Care Providers in the Specialist-Dominant Primary Care Setting of Korea: A Cluster Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0161937
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161937
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161937&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0161937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nak-Jin Sung & Yong-Jun Choi & Jae-Ho Lee, 2018. "Primary Care Comprehensiveness Can Reduce Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization in People with Hypertension in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Agnus M. Kim & Seongcheol Cho & Hyun Joo Kim & Min-Woo Jo & Sang Jun Eun & Jin Yong Lee, 2018. "Rethinking the Role of the Public Health Clinic: Comparison of Outpatient Utilization in the Public Health Clinics and Private Clinics in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Agnus M. Kim & Sungchan Kang & Jong Heon Park & Yoon Kim, 2020. "Regional Variation of Hospitalization Rates for Asthma in Korea: Association with Ambient Carbon Monoxide and Health Care Supply," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-10, February.
    4. Yoonju Lee & Heejin Kim & Hyesun Jeong & Yunhwan Noh, 2020. "Patterns of Multimorbidity in Adults: An Association Rules Analysis Using the Korea Health Panel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0161937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.