IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0161512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Many Fish Need to Be Measured to Effectively Evaluate Trawl Selectivity?

Author

Listed:
  • Bent Herrmann
  • Manu Sistiaga
  • Juan Santos
  • Antonello Sala

Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide practitioners working with trawl selectivity with general and easily understandable guidelines regarding the fish sampling effort necessary during sea trials. In particular, we focused on how many fish would need to be caught and length measured in a trawl haul in order to assess the selectivity parameters of the trawl at a designated uncertainty level. We also investigated the dependency of this uncertainty level on the experimental method used to collect data and on the potential effects of factors such as the size structure in the catch relative to the size selection of the gear. We based this study on simulated data created from two different fisheries: the Barents Sea cod (Gadus morhua) trawl fishery and the Mediterranean Sea multispecies trawl fishery represented by red mullet (Mullus barbatus). We used these two completely different fisheries to obtain results that can be used as general guidelines for other fisheries. We found that the uncertainty in the selection parameters decreased with increasing number of fish measured and that this relationship could be described by a power model. The sampling effort needed to achieve a specific uncertainty level for the selection parameters was always lower for the covered codend method compared to the paired-gear method. In many cases, the number of fish that would need to be measured to maintain a specific uncertainty level was around 10 times higher for the paired-gear method than for the covered codend method. The trends observed for the effect of sampling effort in the two fishery cases investigated were similar; therefore the guidelines presented herein should be applicable to other fisheries.

Suggested Citation

  • Bent Herrmann & Manu Sistiaga & Juan Santos & Antonello Sala, 2016. "How Many Fish Need to Be Measured to Effectively Evaluate Trawl Selectivity?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0161512
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161512
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161512&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0161512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiago Veiga-Malta & Jordan Feekings & Bent Herrmann & Ludvig Ahm Krag, 2018. "When is enough, enough? Quantifying trade-offs between information quality and sampling effort for fishing gear selectivity data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Bingzhong Yang & Bent Herrmann, 2022. "T90 Codends Improve the Size Selectivity and Catch Efficiency of Shrimp Trawl Fisheries for Southern Velvet Shrimp ( Metapenaeopsis palmensis ) in the South China Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0161512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.