IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0160503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Neural Responses to Social Cooperation in Gain and Loss Context

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Sun
  • Li Zheng
  • Lin Li
  • Xiuyan Guo
  • Weidong Zhang
  • Yijie Zheng

Abstract

Cooperation is pervasive and constitutes the core behavioral principle of human social life. Previous studies have revealed that mutual cooperation was reliably correlated with two reward-related brain regions, the ventral striatum and the orbitofrontal cortex. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), this study sought to investigate how the loss and gain contexts modulated the neural responses to mutual cooperation. Twenty-five female participants were scanned when they played a series of one-shot prisoner’s dilemma games in the loss and gain contexts. Specifically, participants and partners independently chose to either cooperate with each other or not, and each was awarded or deprived of (in the gain context or the loss context, respectively) a sum of money which depended upon the interaction of their choices. Behavioral results indicated that participants cooperated in nearly half of the experiment trials and reported higher level of positive emotions for mutual cooperation in both contexts, but they cooperated more in the gain than in the loss context. At the neural level, stronger activities in the orbitofrontal cortex were observed for mutual cooperation compared with the other three outcomes in both contexts, while stronger activation in ventral striatum associated with mutual cooperation was observed in the gain context only. Together, our data indicated that, even in the one-shot interaction under loss context, participants still exhibited preference for cooperation and the rewarding experience from a mutually cooperative social interaction activated the ventral striatum and the orbitofrontal cortex, but the loss context weakened the association between the ventral striatum activation and mutual cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Sun & Li Zheng & Lin Li & Xiuyan Guo & Weidong Zhang & Yijie Zheng, 2016. "The Neural Responses to Social Cooperation in Gain and Loss Context," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0160503
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0160503
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0160503&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0160503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mikhail Kunavin & Tatiana Kozitsina & Mikhail Myagkov & Irina Kozhevnikova & Mikhail Pankov & Ludmila Sokolova, 2021. "Bioelectrical brain activity can predict prosocial behavior," Papers 2105.14587, arXiv.org.
    2. Khalil Thompson & Eddy Nahmias & Negar Fani & Trevor Kvaran & Jessica Turner & Erin Tone, 2021. "The Prisoner’s Dilemma paradigm provides a neurobiological framework for the social decision cascade," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0160503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.