IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0160002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Association between the Cross-Sectional Area of the Dural Sac and Low Back Pain in a Large Population: The Wakayama Spine Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroki Iwahashi
  • Noriko Yoshimura
  • Hiroshi Hashizume
  • Hiroshi Yamada
  • Hiroyuki Oka
  • Ko Matsudaira
  • Kazunori Shinto
  • Yuyu Ishimoto
  • Keiji Nagata
  • Masatoshi Teraguchi
  • Ryohei Kagotani
  • Shigeyuki Muraki
  • Toru Akune
  • Sakae Tanaka
  • Hiroshi Kawaguchi
  • Kozo Nakamura
  • Akihito Minamide
  • Yukihiro Nakagawa
  • Munehito Yoshida

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relations between the degree of encroachment, measured as the cross-sectional area of the dural sac, and low back pain in a large population. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, data from 802 participants (247 men, 555 women; mean age, 63.5 years) were analyzed. The measurement of the cross-sectional area of the dural sac from the level of L1/2 to L4/5 was taken using axial T2-weighted images. The minimum cross-sectional area was defined as the cross-sectional area of the dural sac at the most constricted level in the examined spine. Participants were divided into three groups according to minimum cross-sectional area measurement quartiles (less than the first quartile, between the first and third quartiles, and greater than the third quartile). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between the minimum cross-sectional area and the prevalence of low back pain. Results: The mean minimum cross-sectional area was 117.3 mm2 (men: 114.4 mm2; women: 118.6 mm2). A logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and other confounding factors, including disc degeneration, showed that a narrow minimum cross-sectional area (smaller than the first quartile) was significantly associated with low back pain (odds ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.13–2.80 compared to the wide minimum cross-sectional area group: minimum cross-sectional area greater than the third quartile measured). Conclusion: This study showed that a narrow dural sac cross-sectional area was significantly associated with the presence of low back pain after adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index. Further investigations that include additional radiographic findings and psychological factors will continue to elucidate the causes of low back pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroki Iwahashi & Noriko Yoshimura & Hiroshi Hashizume & Hiroshi Yamada & Hiroyuki Oka & Ko Matsudaira & Kazunori Shinto & Yuyu Ishimoto & Keiji Nagata & Masatoshi Teraguchi & Ryohei Kagotani & Shigey, 2016. "The Association between the Cross-Sectional Area of the Dural Sac and Low Back Pain in a Large Population: The Wakayama Spine Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0160002
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0160002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0160002&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0160002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takahide Sasaki & Noriko Yoshimura & Hiroshi Hashizume & Hiroshi Yamada & Hiroyuki Oka & Ko Matsudaira & Hiroki Iwahashi & Kazunori Shinto & Yuyu Ishimoto & Keiji Nagata & Masatoshi Teraguchi & Ryohei, 2017. "MRI-defined paraspinal muscle morphology in Japanese population: The Wakayama Spine Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0160002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.