IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0157318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Cluster Analysis at Time of Diagnosis

Author

Listed:
  • Sébastien Bailly
  • Marie Destors
  • Yves Grillet
  • Philippe Richard
  • Bruno Stach
  • Isabelle Vivodtzev
  • Jean-Francois Timsit
  • Patrick Lévy
  • Renaud Tamisier
  • Jean-Louis Pépin
  • scientific council and investigators of the French national sleep apnea registry (OSFP)

Abstract

Background: The classification of obstructive sleep apnea is on the basis of sleep study criteria that may not adequately capture disease heterogeneity. Improved phenotyping may improve prognosis prediction and help select therapeutic strategies. Objectives: This study used cluster analysis to investigate the clinical clusters of obstructive sleep apnea. Methods: An ascending hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on baseline symptoms, physical examination, risk factor exposure and co-morbidities from 18,263 participants in the OSFP (French national registry of sleep apnea). The probability for criteria to be associated with a given cluster was assessed using odds ratios, determined by univariate logistic regression. Results: Six clusters were identified, in which patients varied considerably in age, sex, symptoms, obesity, co-morbidities and environmental risk factors. The main significant differences between clusters were minimally symptomatic versus sleepy obstructive sleep apnea patients, lean versus obese, and among obese patients different combinations of co-morbidities and environmental risk factors. Conclusions: Our cluster analysis identified six distinct clusters of obstructive sleep apnea. Our findings underscore the high degree of heterogeneity that exists within obstructive sleep apnea patients regarding clinical presentation, risk factors and consequences. This may help in both research and clinical practice for validating new prevention programs, in diagnosis and in decisions regarding therapeutic strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sébastien Bailly & Marie Destors & Yves Grillet & Philippe Richard & Bruno Stach & Isabelle Vivodtzev & Jean-Francois Timsit & Patrick Lévy & Renaud Tamisier & Jean-Louis Pépin & scientific council an, 2016. "Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Cluster Analysis at Time of Diagnosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0157318
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157318
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157318&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0157318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dan Adler & Elise Dupuis-Lozeron & Jean Paul Janssens & Paola M Soccal & Frédéric Lador & Laurent Brochard & Jean-Louis Pépin, 2018. "Obstructive sleep apnea in patients surviving acute hypercapnic respiratory failure is best predicted by static hyperinflation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Hsiu‐Chin Hsu & Ning‐Hung Chen & Wan Jing Ho & Mei‐Hsiang Lin, 2018. "Factors associated with undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea among hypertensive patients: A multisite cross‐sectional survey study in Taiwan," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1901-1912, May.
    3. Pierre Philip & Stéphanie Bioulac & Elemarije Altena & Charles M Morin & Imad Ghorayeb & Olivier Coste & Pierre-Jean Monteyrol & Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi, 2018. "Specific insomnia symptoms and self-efficacy explain CPAP compliance in a sample of OSAS patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Francesca Tartari & Alessandro Conti & Roy Cerqueti, 2017. "Assessing the relationship between toxicity and economic cost of oncological target agents: A systematic review of clinical trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Cecilia Turino & Sandra Bertran & Ricard Gavaldá & Ivan Teixidó & Holger Woehrle & Montserrat Rué & Francesc Solsona & Joan Escarrabill & Cristina Colls & Anna García-Altés & Jordi de Batlle & Manuel , 2017. "Characterization of the CPAP-treated patient population in Catalonia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0157318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.