IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0157269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Novel Scoring System for Predicting the Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia: A Retrospective Study

Author

Listed:
  • Tomohiko Ohno
  • Seiji Adachi
  • Mitsuru Okuno
  • Yohei Horibe
  • Naoe Goto
  • Midori Iwama
  • Osamu Yamauchi
  • Takao Kojima
  • Koshiro Saito
  • Takashi Ibuka
  • Ichiro Yasuda
  • Hiroshi Araki
  • Hisataka Moriwaki
  • Masahito Shimizu

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a novel scoring system to screen subjects who have a high risk for colorectal neoplasia. Study Design and Setting: We retrospectively analyzed 1061 subjects undergoing total colonoscopy (TCS) for the first time at Gihoku Kosei Hospital. The characteristics and habits of the subjects were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. The risk score was established according to each odds ratio of the individual risk factors, and the correlations between the sum of the risk scores and the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia for each individual were evaluated. Results: Age 45–59 (risk score: 2 points) and ≥60 (3 points), male gender (1 point), and habitual alcohol consumption ≥21g daily (1 point) were extracted as the significant risk factors for colorectal neoplasia. When the risk groups were determined by summing up these risk scores, the prevalence rates of colorectal neoplasia were 8.8% for the low risk group (0–2 points), 30.5% for the low-moderate risk group (3 points), 39.1% for the high-moderate risk group (4 points), and 57.6% for the high risk group (5 points). In comparison with the low risk group, the odds ratio of the low-moderate risk, the high-moderate risk, and the high risk groups were 4.6, 6.7, and 14.1 folds, respectively. Conclusion: Our scoring system, which linearly correlates with the prevalence rate of colorectal neoplasia, may be an effective tool for screening the subjects who have a high risk for colorectal neoplasia. These subjects, therefore, should be recommended to undergo TCS.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomohiko Ohno & Seiji Adachi & Mitsuru Okuno & Yohei Horibe & Naoe Goto & Midori Iwama & Osamu Yamauchi & Takao Kojima & Koshiro Saito & Takashi Ibuka & Ichiro Yasuda & Hiroshi Araki & Hisataka Moriwa, 2016. "Development of a Novel Scoring System for Predicting the Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia: A Retrospective Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0157269
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157269
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0157269&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0157269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0157269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.