IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0156795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Medical Representatives on Prescribing Practices in Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Birhanu Demeke Workneh
  • Mehari Gebregergis Gebrehiwot
  • Tigist Assefa Bayo
  • Meles Tekie Gidey
  • Yared Belete Belay
  • Desalegn Mergiaw Tesfaye
  • Terefe Teshome Kassa

Abstract

Background: Drug promotion by medical representatives is one of the factors that influence physicians’ prescribing decisions and choice of drugs. Objective: To assess the influence of medical representatives on prescribing practice of physicians in health facilities, Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia. Materials and Methods: Facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted enrolling all physicians working in public and private health facilities. All public and private health facilities were included and similarly, all physicians rendering services in these facilities were sampled in the study. The data were collected from February to March, 2015. Data were then entered into Epidata Version 3.1 and transferred to STATA version 12 for analysis. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to determine predictors. Results: Of the ninety physicians approached in this study, 40 (48.2%) of the physicians believed that their prescribing decisions were influenced by visits of medical representatives (MRs). The odds of physicians who received gifts from MRs being influenced to prescribe their respective products was six times higher than those who reported not accepting any gifts [AOR = 6.56, 95% CI: 2.25, 19.13]. Stationery materials 23(35.4%) and drug samples 20(54.2%) were the commonest kinds of gifts given to physicians and face to face talking 45(54.2%) was the most frequent promotional methods. The finding of this study showed that around thirty-nine percent of MRs have had negative attitude toward competitors’ product. Moreover, working in private health facility was also another predictor of influence of prescribing decision in the study area [AOR = 12.78, 95% CI: 1.31, 124.56]. Conclusion: Nearly half of the physicians working in Mekelle reported that their prescribing decisions were influenced by MRs in the last 12 months. Accepting gifts and working in private health facilities were predictors of influencing prescribing decisions. However, most MRs fails to provide adequate and accurate information regarding their products and they had a negative attitude towards the competitors’ product(s).

Suggested Citation

  • Birhanu Demeke Workneh & Mehari Gebregergis Gebrehiwot & Tigist Assefa Bayo & Meles Tekie Gidey & Yared Belete Belay & Desalegn Mergiaw Tesfaye & Terefe Teshome Kassa, 2016. "Influence of Medical Representatives on Prescribing Practices in Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0156795
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156795
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156795&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0156795?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0156795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.