IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0155517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Factors of Spontaneous Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions among Community Pharmacists

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Mi Yu
  • Euni Lee
  • Bon Sun Koo
  • Kyeong Hye Jeong
  • Kyung Hee Choi
  • Lee Kyung Kang
  • Mo Se Lee
  • Kwang Hoon Choi
  • Jung Mi Oh
  • Wan Gyoon Shin

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the association between spontaneous reporting (SR) and the knowledge, attitude, and needs of community pharmacists (CPs), using a questionnaire following a conceptual model known as the mixed model of knowledge-attitude-practices and the satisfaction of needs. Methods: Self-administered questionnaires were used with a nationwide convenience sample of CPs between September 1, 2014 and November 25, 2014 in Korea. The association between SR and the predictive factors was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: In total, 1,001 questionnaires were analyzed. The mean age of the respondents and the number of years spent in community pharmacy practice were 45.6 years and 15.3 years, respectively. CPs with experience of SR was 29.4%. Being older than 60 (ORadj, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06–0.42), having prior experience with adverse drug reactions (ADR) (ORadj, 6.46; 95% CI, 2.46–16.98), having higher specific knowledge of SR (ORadj, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.96–6.56), and having less concern about the obstacles to SR (ORadj, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23–0.57) were significant contributing factors to SR. The main obstacles to SR included perception of ADRs as ‘not serious ADR’ (77.9%), ‘already well known ADR’ (81.5%), and ‘uncertain about causality’ (73.3%). CPs without reporting experience had greater concerns related to the reporting method and the liability of the pharmacy than those with reporting experience (p

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Mi Yu & Euni Lee & Bon Sun Koo & Kyeong Hye Jeong & Kyung Hee Choi & Lee Kyung Kang & Mo Se Lee & Kwang Hoon Choi & Jung Mi Oh & Wan Gyoon Shin, 2016. "Predictive Factors of Spontaneous Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions among Community Pharmacists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0155517
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155517
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155517&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0155517?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanne Barnes & Rachael Butler, 2020. "Community Pharmacists’ Views and Experiences with ADR Reporting for Complementary Medicines: A Qualitative Study in New Zealand," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(11), pages 1157-1170, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0155517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.