IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0153748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Descriptive Epidemiology of Somatising Tendency: Findings from the CUPID Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Vargas-Prada
  • David Coggon
  • Georgia Ntani
  • Karen Walker-Bone
  • Keith T Palmer
  • Vanda E Felli
  • Raul Harari
  • Lope H Barrero
  • Sarah A Felknor
  • David Gimeno
  • Anna Cattrell
  • Matteo Bonzini
  • Eleni Solidaki
  • Eda Merisalu
  • Rima R Habib
  • Farideh Sadeghian
  • M Masood Kadir
  • Sudath S P Warnakulasuriya
  • Ko Matsudaira
  • Busisiwe Nyantumbu
  • Malcolm R Sim
  • Helen Harcombe
  • Ken Cox
  • Leila M M Sarquis
  • Maria H Marziale
  • Florencia Harari
  • Rocio Freire
  • Natalia Harari
  • Magda V Monroy
  • Leonardo A Quintana
  • Marianela Rojas
  • E Clare Harris
  • Consol Serra
  • J Miguel Martinez
  • George Delclos
  • Fernando G Benavides
  • Michele Carugno
  • Marco M Ferrario
  • Angela C Pesatori
  • Leda Chatzi
  • Panos Bitsios
  • Manolis Kogevinas
  • Kristel Oha
  • Tiina Freimann
  • Ali Sadeghian
  • Roshini J Peiris-John
  • Nalini Sathiakumar
  • A Rajitha Wickremasinghe
  • Noriko Yoshimura
  • Helen L Kelsall
  • Victor C W Hoe
  • Donna M Urquhart
  • Sarah Derrett
  • David McBride
  • Peter Herbison
  • Andrew Gray
  • Eduardo J Salazar Vega

Abstract

Somatising tendency, defined as a predisposition to worry about common somatic symptoms, is importantly associated with various aspects of health and health-related behaviour, including musculoskeletal pain and associated disability. To explore its epidemiological characteristics, and how it can be specified most efficiently, we analysed data from an international longitudinal study. A baseline questionnaire, which included questions from the Brief Symptom Inventory about seven common symptoms, was completed by 12,072 participants aged 20–59 from 46 occupational groups in 18 countries (response rate 70%). The seven symptoms were all mutually associated (odds ratios for pairwise associations 3.4 to 9.3), and each contributed to a measure of somatising tendency that exhibited an exposure-response relationship both with multi-site pain (prevalence rate ratios up to six), and also with sickness absence for non-musculoskeletal reasons. In most participants, the level of somatising tendency was little changed when reassessed after a mean interval of 14 months (75% having a change of 0 or 1 in their symptom count), although the specific symptoms reported at follow-up often differed from those at baseline. Somatising tendency was more common in women than men, especially at older ages, and varied markedly across the 46 occupational groups studied, with higher rates in South and Central America. It was weakly associated with smoking, but not with level of education. Our study supports the use of questions from the Brief Symptom Inventory as a method for measuring somatising tendency, and suggests that in adults of working age, it is a fairly stable trait.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Vargas-Prada & David Coggon & Georgia Ntani & Karen Walker-Bone & Keith T Palmer & Vanda E Felli & Raul Harari & Lope H Barrero & Sarah A Felknor & David Gimeno & Anna Cattrell & Matteo Bonzini, 2016. "Descriptive Epidemiology of Somatising Tendency: Findings from the CUPID Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0153748
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153748
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153748&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0153748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0153748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.