Author
Listed:
- Aline De Vleminck
- Koen Pardon
- Kim Beernaert
- Dirk Houttekier
- Robert Vander Stichele
- Luc Deliens
Abstract
Objectives: To explore how GPs conceptualise advance care planning (ACP), based on their experiences with ACP in their practice. Methods: Five focus groups were held with 36 GPs. Discussions were analysed using a constant comparative method. Results: Four overarching themes in the conceptualisations of ACP were discerned: (1) the organisation of professional care required to meet patients’ needs, (2) the process of preparing for death and discussing palliative care options, (3) the discussion of care goals and treatment decisions, (4) the completion of advance directives. Within these themes, ACP was both conceptualised in terms of content of ACP and/or in terms of tasks for the GP. A specific task that was mentioned throughout the discussion of the four different themes was (5) the task of actively initiating ACP by the GP versus passively waiting for patients’ initiation. Conclusions: This study illustrates that GPs have varying conceptualisations of ACP, of which some are more limited to specific aspects of ACP. A shared conceptualisation and agreement on the purpose and goals of ACP is needed to ensure successful implementation, as well as a systematic integration of ACP in routine practice that could lead to a better uptake of all the important elements of ACP.
Suggested Citation
Aline De Vleminck & Koen Pardon & Kim Beernaert & Dirk Houttekier & Robert Vander Stichele & Luc Deliens, 2016.
"How Do General Practitioners Conceptualise Advance Care Planning in Their Practice? A Qualitative Study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0153747
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153747
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0153747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.