IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0153606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age Moderates the Relationships between Family Functioning and Neck Pain/Disability

Author

Listed:
  • Grażyna Guzy
  • Romuald Polczyk
  • Malwina Szpitalak
  • Howard Vernon

Abstract

This cross-sectional clinical study was designed to explore the relationships between family functioning, coping styles, and neck pain and neck disability. It was hypothesized that better family functioning and more effective coping styles would be associated with less pain and pain-related disability. It also was hypothesized that these relationships would be stronger in older people because they have fewer resources, more limited coping styles, and may depend more on their family for support. In this study, 88 women with chronic non-traumatic neck pain completed the Family Assessment Measure (FAM), Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and a Visual-Analogue Scale (VAS) measuring the subjective intensity of neck pain. Zero-order and partial correlations and hierarchical stepwise regression were performed. CISS was not correlated with the NDI orVAS. Good family functioning was correlated with lower NDI and VAS scores. Age was found to moderate the relationship between the FAM and both NDI and VAS. This relationship was significant and positive in older patients, but non-significant in younger patients. It was concluded that better family functioning is associated with lower neck disability and pain intensity, especially in the case of older women suffering from non-traumatic neck pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Grażyna Guzy & Romuald Polczyk & Malwina Szpitalak & Howard Vernon, 2016. "Age Moderates the Relationships between Family Functioning and Neck Pain/Disability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0153606
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153606
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153606&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0153606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hui‐Chen Hsu & Chih‐Ju Chang & Heng‐Hsin Tung & Tsae‐Jyy Wang, 2019. "Disability, emotional distress and well‐being among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3866-3878, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0153606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.