IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0152347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Cohort-Study (SMSC): A Prospective Swiss Wide Investigation of Key Phases in Disease Evolution and New Treatment Options

Author

Listed:
  • Giulio Disanto
  • Pascal Benkert
  • Johannes Lorscheider
  • Stefanie Mueller
  • Jochen Vehoff
  • Chiara Zecca
  • Simon Ramseier
  • Lutz Achtnichts
  • Oliver Findling
  • Krassen Nedeltchev
  • Ernst-Wilhelm Radue
  • Till Sprenger
  • Christoph Stippich
  • Tobias Derfuss
  • Jean-François Louvion
  • Christian P Kamm
  • Heinrich P Mattle
  • Christoph Lotter
  • Renaud Du Pasquier
  • Myriam Schluep
  • Caroline Pot
  • Patrice H Lalive
  • Özgür Yaldizli
  • Claudio Gobbi
  • Ludwig Kappos
  • Jens Kuhle
  • SMSC Scientific Board

Abstract

The mechanisms leading to disability and the long-term efficacy and safety of disease modifying drugs (DMDs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) are unclear. We aimed at building a prospective cohort of MS patients with standardized collection of demographic, clinical, MRI data and body fluids that can be used to develop prognostic indicators and biomarkers of disease evolution and therapeutic response. The Swiss MS Cohort (SMSC) is a prospective observational study performed across seven Swiss MS centers including patients with MS, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), radiologically isolated syndrome or neuromyelitis optica. Neurological and radiological assessments and biological samples are collected every 6–12 months. We recruited 872 patients (clinically isolated syndrome [CIS] 5.5%, relapsing-remitting MS [RRMS] 85.8%, primary progressive MS [PPMS] 3.5%, secondary progressive MS [SPMS] 5.2%) between June 2012 and July 2015. We performed 2,286 visits (median follow-up 398 days) and collected 2,274 serum, plasma and blood samples, 152 cerebrospinal fluid samples and 1,276 brain MRI scans. 158 relapses occurred and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores increased in PPMS, SPMS and RRMS patients experiencing relapses. Most RRMS patients were treated with fingolimod (33.4%), natalizumab (24.5%) or injectable DMDs (13.6%). The SMSC will provide relevant information regarding DMDs efficacy and safety and will serve as a comprehensive infrastructure available for nested research projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulio Disanto & Pascal Benkert & Johannes Lorscheider & Stefanie Mueller & Jochen Vehoff & Chiara Zecca & Simon Ramseier & Lutz Achtnichts & Oliver Findling & Krassen Nedeltchev & Ernst-Wilhelm Radue, 2016. "The Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Cohort-Study (SMSC): A Prospective Swiss Wide Investigation of Key Phases in Disease Evolution and New Treatment Options," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0152347
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0152347
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0152347&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0152347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0152347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.