IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0149856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich-Peter Rohr
  • Carmen Binder
  • Thomas Dieterle
  • Francesco Giusti
  • Carlo Guiseppe Mario Messina
  • Eduard Toerien
  • Holger Moch
  • Hans Hendrik Schäfer

Abstract

Background: In vitro diagnostic (IVD) investigations are indispensable for routine patient management. Appropriate testing allows early-stage interventions, reducing late-stage healthcare expenditure (HCE). Aim: To investigate HCE on IVDs in two developed markets and to assess the perceived value of IVDs on clinical decision-making. Physician-perceived HCE on IVD was evaluated, as well as desired features of new diagnostic markers. Methods: Past and current HCE on IVD was calculated for the US and Germany. A total of 79 US/German oncologists and cardiologists were interviewed to assess the number of cases where: physicians ask for IVDs; IVDs are used for initial diagnosis, treatment monitoring, or post-treatment; and decision-making is based on an IVD test result. A sample of 201 US and German oncologists and cardiologists was questioned regarding the proportion of HCE they believed to be attributable to IVD testing. After disclosing the actual IVD HCE, the physician’s perception of the appropriateness of the amount was captured. Finally, the association between physician-rated impact of IVD on decision-making and perceived contribution of IVD expenditure on overall HCE was assessed. Results: IVD costs account for 2.3% and 1.4% of total HCE in the US and Germany. Most physicians (81%) believed that the actual HCE on IVDs was >5%; 19% rated the spending correctly (0–4%, p

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich-Peter Rohr & Carmen Binder & Thomas Dieterle & Francesco Giusti & Carlo Guiseppe Mario Messina & Eduard Toerien & Holger Moch & Hans Hendrik Schäfer, 2016. "The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0149856
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149856
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149856&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0149856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aldo Bonadies & Rita Mancini & Marilia Maci & Chiara Gibertoni & Anna Maria Petrini, 2020. "Laboratorio Unico Metropolitano: innovazione e alta tecnologia per un nuovo paradigma di medicina di laboratorio," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(115), pages 79-94.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0149856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.