IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0149814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Method for Correct Identification of Archaeological Charred Grape Seeds: Support for Advances in Knowledge of Grape Domestication Process

Author

Listed:
  • Mariano Ucchesu
  • Martino Orrù
  • Oscar Grillo
  • Gianfranco Venora
  • Giacomo Paglietti
  • Andrea Ardu
  • Gianluigi Bacchetta

Abstract

The identification of archaeological charred grape seeds is a difficult task due to the alteration of the morphological seeds shape. In archaeobotanical studies, for the correct discrimination between Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris and Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera grape seeds it is very important to understand the history and origin of the domesticated grapevine. In this work, different carbonisation experiments were carried out using a hearth to reproduce the same burning conditions that occurred in archaeological contexts. In addition, several carbonisation trials on modern wild and cultivated grape seeds were performed using a muffle furnace. For comparison with archaeological materials, modern grape seed samples were obtained using seven different temperatures of carbonisation ranging between 180 and 340ºC for 120 min. Analysing the grape seed size and shape by computer vision techniques, and applying the stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA) method, discrimination of the wild from the cultivated charred grape seeds was possible. An overall correct classification of 93.3% was achieved. Applying the same statistical procedure to compare modern charred with archaeological grape seeds, found in Sardinia and dating back to the Early Bronze Age (2017–1751 2σ cal. BC), allowed 75.0% of the cases to be identified as wild grape. The proposed method proved to be a useful and effective procedure in identifying, with high accuracy, the charred grape seeds found in archaeological sites. Moreover, it may be considered valid support for advances in the knowledge and comprehension of viticulture adoption and the grape domestication process. The same methodology may also be successful when applied to other plant remains, and provide important information about the history of domesticated plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariano Ucchesu & Martino Orrù & Oscar Grillo & Gianfranco Venora & Giacomo Paglietti & Andrea Ardu & Gianluigi Bacchetta, 2016. "Predictive Method for Correct Identification of Archaeological Charred Grape Seeds: Support for Advances in Knowledge of Grape Domestication Process," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0149814
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149814
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149814&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0149814?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Maria Mercuri & Paola Torri & Assunta Florenzano & Eleonora Clò & Marta Mariotti Lippi & Elisabetta Sgarbi & Cristina Bignami, 2021. "Sharing the Agrarian Knowledge with Archaeology: First Evidence of the Dimorphism of Vitis Pollen from the Middle Bronze Age of N Italy (Terramara Santa Rosa di Poviglio)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Vincent Bonhomme & Sandrine Picq & Sarah Ivorra & Allowen Evin & Thierry Pastor & Roberto Bacilieri & Thierry Lacombe & Isabel Figueiral & Jean-Frédéric Terral & Laurent Bouby, 2020. "Eco-evo-devo implications and archaeobiological perspectives of trait covariance in fruits of wild and domesticated grapevines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0149814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.