IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0143697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Different Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mahesh Nagappa
  • Pu Liao
  • Jean Wong
  • Dennis Auckley
  • Satya Krishna Ramachandran
  • Stavros Memtsoudis
  • Babak Mokhlesi
  • Frances Chung

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is clinically relevant because untreated OSA has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a validated screening tool for OSA. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of STOP-Bang for screening patients suspected of having OSA and to predict its accuracy in determining the severity of OSA in the different populations. Methods: A search of the literature databases was performed. Inclusion criteria were: 1) Studies that used STOP-Bang questionnaire as a screening tool for OSA in adult subjects (>18 years); 2) The accuracy of the STOP-Bang questionnaire was validated by polysomnography—the gold standard for diagnosing OSA; 3) OSA was clearly defined as apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) or respiratory disturbance index (RDI) ≥ 5; 4) Publications in the English language. The quality of the studies were explicitly described and coded according to the Cochrane Methods group on the screening and diagnostic tests. Results: Seventeen studies including 9,206 patients met criteria for the systematic review. In the sleep clinic population, the sensitivity was 90%, 94% and 96% to detect any OSA (AHI ≥ 5), moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥15), and severe OSA (AHI ≥30) respectively. The corresponding NPV was 46%, 75% and 90%. A similar trend was found in the surgical population. In the sleep clinic population, the probability of severe OSA with a STOP-Bang score of 3 was 25%. With a stepwise increase of the STOP-Bang score to 4, 5, 6 and 7/8, the probability rose proportionally to 35%, 45%, 55% and 75%, respectively. In the surgical population, the probability of severe OSA with a STOP-Bang score of 3 was 15%. With a stepwise increase of the STOP-Bang score to 4, 5, 6 and 7/8, the probability increased to 25%, 35%, 45% and 65%, respectively. Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms the high performance of the STOP-Bang questionnaire in the sleep clinic and surgical population for screening of OSA. The higher the STOP-Bang score, the greater is the probability of moderate-to-severe OSA.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahesh Nagappa & Pu Liao & Jean Wong & Dennis Auckley & Satya Krishna Ramachandran & Stavros Memtsoudis & Babak Mokhlesi & Frances Chung, 2015. "Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Different Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0143697
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143697
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143697&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0143697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ibrahim M Alsalamah & Raghib Abusaris, 2022. "Prevalence and Associated Factors of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Saudi Arabia: A Web Based Questionnaire Based Study," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(7), pages 1-61, July.
    2. Manlio Santilli & Eugenio Manciocchi & Gianmaria D’Addazio & Erica Di Maria & Michele D’Attilio & Beatrice Femminella & Bruna Sinjari, 2021. "Prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Single-Center Retrospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-10, September.
    3. Maria Romera-Vilchez & Trinidad Montero-Vilchez & Manuel Herrero-Fernandez & Juan-Angel Rodriguez-Pozo & Gonzalo Jimenez-Galvez & Concepcion Morales-Garcia & Agustin Buendia-Eisman & Salvador Arias-Sa, 2022. "Impact of Exposome Factors on Epidermal Barrier Function in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Elena Benito-González & Maria Palacios-Ceña & Juan J Fernández-Muñoz & Matteo Castaldo & Kelun Wang & Antonella Catena & Lars Arendt-Nielsen & César Fernández-de-las-Peñas, 2018. "Variables associated with sleep quality in chronic tension-type headache: A cross-sectional and longitudinal design," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0143697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.