IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0141993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare Databases in Thailand and Japan: Potential Sources for Health Technology Assessment Research

Author

Listed:
  • Surasak Saokaew
  • Takashi Sugimoto
  • Isao Kamae
  • Chayanin Pratoomsoot
  • Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk

Abstract

Background: Health technology assessment (HTA) has been continuously used for value-based healthcare decisions over the last decade. Healthcare databases represent an important source of information for HTA, which has seen a surge in use in Western countries. Although HTA agencies have been established in Asia-Pacific region, application and understanding of healthcare databases for HTA is rather limited. Thus, we reviewed existing databases to assess their potential for HTA in Thailand where HTA has been used officially and Japan where HTA is going to be officially introduced. Method: Existing healthcare databases in Thailand and Japan were compiled and reviewed. Databases’ characteristics e.g. name of database, host, scope/objective, time/sample size, design, data collection method, population/sample, and variables were described. Databases were assessed for its potential HTA use in terms of safety/efficacy/effectiveness, social/ethical, organization/professional, economic, and epidemiological domains. Request route for each database was also provided. Results: Forty databases– 20 from Thailand and 20 from Japan—were included. These comprised of national censuses, surveys, registries, administrative data, and claimed databases. All databases were potentially used for epidemiological studies. In addition, data on mortality, morbidity, disability, adverse events, quality of life, service/technology utilization, length of stay, and economics were also found in some databases. However, access to patient-level data was limited since information about the databases was not available on public sources. Conclusion: Our findings have shown that existing databases provided valuable information for HTA research with limitation on accessibility. Mutual dialogue on healthcare database development and usage for HTA among Asia-Pacific region is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Surasak Saokaew & Takashi Sugimoto & Isao Kamae & Chayanin Pratoomsoot & Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, 2015. "Healthcare Databases in Thailand and Japan: Potential Sources for Health Technology Assessment Research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0141993
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141993
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141993&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0141993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce Campbell & Mark Campbell, 2012. "NICE Medical Technologies Guidance," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 10(5), pages 295-297, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edlira Skrami & Flavia Carle & Simona Villani & Paola Borrelli & Antonella Zambon & Giovanni Corrao & Paolo Trerotoli & Vincenzo Guardabasso & Rosaria Gesuita, 2019. "Availability of Real-World Data in Italy: A Tool to Navigate Regional Healthcare Utilization Databases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0141993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.