IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0141606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single-Item Measurement of Suicidal Behaviors: Validity and Consequences of Misclassification

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander J Millner
  • Michael D Lee
  • Matthew K Nock

Abstract

Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. Although research has made strides in better defining suicidal behaviors, there has been less focus on accurate measurement. Currently, the widespread use of self-report, single-item questions to assess suicide ideation, plans and attempts may contribute to measurement problems and misclassification. We examined the validity of single-item measurement and the potential for statistical errors. Over 1,500 participants completed an online survey containing single-item questions regarding a history of suicidal behaviors, followed by questions with more precise language, multiple response options and narrative responses to examine the validity of single-item questions. We also conducted simulations to test whether common statistical tests are robust against the degree of misclassification produced by the use of single-items. We found that 11.3% of participants that endorsed a single-item suicide attempt measure engaged in behavior that would not meet the standard definition of a suicide attempt. Similarly, 8.8% of those who endorsed a single-item measure of suicide ideation endorsed thoughts that would not meet standard definitions of suicide ideation. Statistical simulations revealed that this level of misclassification substantially decreases statistical power and increases the likelihood of false conclusions from statistical tests. Providing a wider range of response options for each item reduced the misclassification rate by approximately half. Overall, the use of single-item, self-report questions to assess the presence of suicidal behaviors leads to misclassification, increasing the likelihood of statistical decision errors. Improving the measurement of suicidal behaviors is critical to increase understanding and prevention of suicide.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander J Millner & Michael D Lee & Matthew K Nock, 2015. "Single-Item Measurement of Suicidal Behaviors: Validity and Consequences of Misclassification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0141606
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141606
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141606&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0141606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicholas J Carson & Brian Mullin & Maria Jose Sanchez & Frederick Lu & Kelly Yang & Michelle Menezes & Benjamin LĂȘ Cook, 2019. "Identification of suicidal behavior among psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents using natural language processing and machine learning of electronic health records," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Subin Park & Soo Jung Rim & Jin Yong Jun, 2018. "Related Factors of Suicidal Ideation among North Korean Refugee Youth in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-8, August.
    3. Rebecca A. Bernert & Amanda M. Hilberg & Ruth Melia & Jane Paik Kim & Nigam H. Shah & Freddy Abnousi, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence and Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Investigations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-25, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0141606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.