IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0140330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pain Intensity Recognition Rates via Biopotential Feature Patterns with Support Vector Machines

Author

Listed:
  • Sascha Gruss
  • Roi Treister
  • Philipp Werner
  • Harald C Traue
  • Stephen Crawcour
  • Adriano Andrade
  • Steffen Walter

Abstract

Background: The clinically used methods of pain diagnosis do not allow for objective and robust measurement, and physicians must rely on the patient’s report on the pain sensation. Verbal scales, visual analog scales (VAS) or numeric rating scales (NRS) count among the most common tools, which are restricted to patients with normal mental abilities. There also exist instruments for pain assessment in people with verbal and / or cognitive impairments and instruments for pain assessment in people who are sedated and automated ventilated. However, all these diagnostic methods either have limited reliability and validity or are very time-consuming. In contrast, biopotentials can be automatically analyzed with machine learning algorithms to provide a surrogate measure of pain intensity. Methods: In this context, we created a database of biopotentials to advance an automated pain recognition system, determine its theoretical testing quality, and optimize its performance. Eighty-five participants were subjected to painful heat stimuli (baseline, pain threshold, two intermediate thresholds, and pain tolerance threshold) under controlled conditions and the signals of electromyography, skin conductance level, and electrocardiography were collected. A total of 159 features were extracted from the mathematical groupings of amplitude, frequency, stationarity, entropy, linearity, variability, and similarity. Results: We achieved classification rates of 90.94% for baseline vs. pain tolerance threshold and 79.29% for baseline vs. pain threshold. The most selected pain features stemmed from the amplitude and similarity group and were derived from facial electromyography. Conclusion: The machine learning measurement of pain in patients could provide valuable information for a clinical team and thus support the treatment assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sascha Gruss & Roi Treister & Philipp Werner & Harald C Traue & Stephen Crawcour & Adriano Andrade & Steffen Walter, 2015. "Pain Intensity Recognition Rates via Biopotential Feature Patterns with Support Vector Machines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0140330
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0140330
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0140330&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0140330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark J Panaggio & Daniel M Abrams & Fan Yang & Tanvi Banerjee & Nirmish R Shah, 2021. "Can subjective pain be inferred from objective physiological data? Evidence from patients with sickle cell disease," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0140330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.