IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0140119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Vessel Traffic and Noise Levels Received by Killer Whales (Orcinus orca)

Author

Listed:
  • Juliana Houghton
  • Marla M Holt
  • Deborah A Giles
  • M Bradley Hanson
  • Candice K Emmons
  • Jeffrey T Hogan
  • Trevor A Branch
  • Glenn R VanBlaricom

Abstract

Whale watching has become increasingly popular as an ecotourism activity around the globe and is beneficial for environmental education and local economies. Southern Resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) comprise an endangered population that is frequently observed by a large whale watching fleet in the inland waters of Washington state and British Columbia. One of the factors identified as a risk to recovery for the population is the effect of vessels and associated noise. An examination of the effects of vessels and associated noise on whale behavior utilized novel equipment to address limitations of previous studies. Digital acoustic recording tags (DTAGs) measured the noise levels the tagged whales received while laser positioning systems allowed collection of geo-referenced data for tagged whales and all vessels within 1000 m of the tagged whale. The objective of the current study was to compare vessel data and DTAG recordings to relate vessel traffic to the ambient noise received by tagged whales. Two analyses were conducted, one including all recording intervals, and one that excluded intervals when only the research vessel was present. For all data, significant predictors of noise levels were length (inverse relationship), number of propellers, and vessel speed, but only 15% of the variation in noise was explained by this model. When research-vessel-only intervals were excluded, vessel speed was the only significant predictor of noise levels, and explained 42% of the variation. Simple linear regressions (ignoring covariates) found that average vessel speed and number of propellers were the only significant correlates with noise levels. We conclude that vessel speed is the most important predictor of noise levels received by whales in this study. Thus, measures that reduce vessel speed in the vicinity of killer whales would reduce noise exposure in this population.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliana Houghton & Marla M Holt & Deborah A Giles & M Bradley Hanson & Candice K Emmons & Jeffrey T Hogan & Trevor A Branch & Glenn R VanBlaricom, 2015. "The Relationship between Vessel Traffic and Noise Levels Received by Killer Whales (Orcinus orca)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0140119
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0140119
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0140119&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0140119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew D. Foote & Richard W. Osborne & A. Rus Hoelzel, 2004. "Whale-call response to masking boat noise," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6986), pages 910-910, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valbona Aliko & Cristiana Roberta Multisanti & Blerta Turani & Caterina Faggio, 2022. "Get Rid of Marine Pollution: Bioremediation an Innovative, Attractive, and Successful Cleaning Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0140119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.