Author
Listed:
- Luis F Díaz-Vilela
- Naira Delgado Rodríguez
- Rosa Isla-Díaz
- Dolores Díaz-Cabrera
- Estefanía Hernández-Fernaud
- Christian Rosales-Sánchez
Abstract
Work performance is one of the most important dependent variables in Work and Organizational Psychology. The main objective of this paper was to explore the relationships between citizenship performance and task performance measures obtained from different appraisers and their consistency through a seldom-used methodology, intraclass correlation coefficients. Participants were 135 public employees, the total staff in a local government department. Jobs were clustered into job families through a work analysis based on standard questionnaires. A task description technique was used to develop a performance appraisal questionnaire for each job family, with three versions: self-, supervisor-, and peer-evaluation, in addition to a measure of citizenship performance. Only when the self-appraisal bias is controlled, significant correlations appeared between task performance rates. However, intraclass correlations analyses show that only self- (contextual and task) performance measures are consistent, while interrater agreement disappears. These results provide some interesting clues about the procedure of appraisal instrument development, the role of appraisers, and the importance of choosing adequate consistency analysis methods.
Suggested Citation
Luis F Díaz-Vilela & Naira Delgado Rodríguez & Rosa Isla-Díaz & Dolores Díaz-Cabrera & Estefanía Hernández-Fernaud & Christian Rosales-Sánchez, 2015.
"Relationships between Contextual and Task Performance and Interrater Agreement: Are There Any?,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0139898
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139898
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0139898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.