IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0138251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Michael P Thomas
  • Craig S Parzynski
  • Jeptha P Curtis
  • Milan Seth
  • Brahmajee K Nallamothu
  • Paul S Chan
  • John A Spertus
  • Manesh R Patel
  • Steven M Bradley
  • Hitinder S Gurm

Abstract

Background: Substantial geographic variation exists in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use across the United States. It is unclear the extent to which high PCI utilization can be explained by PCI for inappropriate indications. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between PCI rates across regional healthcare markets utilizing hospital referral regions (HRRs) and PCI appropriateness. Methods: The number of PCI procedures in each HRR was obtained from the 2010 100% Medicare limited data set. HRRs were divided into quintiles of PCI utilization with increasing rates of utilization progressing to quintile 5. NCDR CathPCI Registry® data were used to evaluate patient characteristics, appropriate use criteria (AUC), and outcomes across the HRR quintiles defined by PCI utilization with the study population restricted to HRRs where ≥ 80% of the PCIs were performed at institutions participating in the registry. PCI appropriateness was defined using 2012 AUC by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). Results: Our study cohort comprised of 380,981 patients treated at 178 HRRs. Mean PCI rates per 1,000 increased from 4.6 in Quintile 1 to 10.8 in Quintile 5. The proportion of non-acute PCIs was 27.7% in Quintile 1 increasing to 30.7% in Quintile 5. Significant variation (p

Suggested Citation

  • Michael P Thomas & Craig S Parzynski & Jeptha P Curtis & Milan Seth & Brahmajee K Nallamothu & Paul S Chan & John A Spertus & Manesh R Patel & Steven M Bradley & Hitinder S Gurm, 2015. "Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0138251
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138251
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138251&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0138251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0138251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.