Author
Listed:
- Jose Manuel Trujillo Gómez
- Laura Díaz-Gete
- Carlos Martín-Cantera
- Mireia Fábregas Escurriola
- Maribel Lozano Moreno
- Raquel Burón Leandro
- Ana María Gomez Quintero
- Jose Luis Ballve
- María Lourdes Clemente Jiménez
- Elisa Puigdomènech Puig
- Ramón Casas More
- Beatriz Garcia Rueda
- Marc Casajuana
- Marga Méndez-Aguirre
- David Garcia Bonias
- Soraya Fernández Maestre
- Jessica Sánchez Fondevila
Abstract
Background: The use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the health service is increasing. In spite of limitations, such as lack of time and experience, the deployment of ICTs in the healthcare system has advantages which include patient satisfaction with secure messaging, and time saving benefits and utility for patients and health professionals. ICTs may be helpful as either interventions on their own or as complementary tools to help patients stop smoking. Objectives: To gather opinions from both medical professionals and smokers about an email-based application that had been designed by our research group to help smoking cessation, and identify the advantages and disadvantages associated with interventions based on the utilization of ICTs for this purpose. Methods: A qualitative, descriptive–interpretative study with a phenomenological perspective was performed to identify and interpret the discourses of the participating smokers and primary healthcare professionals. Data were obtained through two techniques: semi-structured individual interviews and discussion groups, which were recorded and later systematically and literally transcribed together with the interviewer’s notes. Data were analyzed with the ATLAS TI 6.0 programme. Results: Seven individual interviews and four focal groups were conducted. The advantages of the application based on the email intervention designed by our research group were said to be the saving of time in consultations and ease of access for patients who found work timetables and following a programme for smoking cessation incompatible. The disadvantages were thought to be a lack of personal contact with the healthcare professional, and the possibility of cheating/ self-deception, and a greater probability of relapse on the part of the smokers. Conclusions: Both patients and healthcare professionals viewed the email-based application to help patients stop smoking as a complementary aid to face-to-face consultations. Nevertheless, ICTs could not substitute personal contact in the smoking cessation programme.
Suggested Citation
Jose Manuel Trujillo Gómez & Laura Díaz-Gete & Carlos Martín-Cantera & Mireia Fábregas Escurriola & Maribel Lozano Moreno & Raquel Burón Leandro & Ana María Gomez Quintero & Jose Luis Ballve & María L, 2015.
"Intervention for Smokers through New Communication Technologies: What Perceptions Do Patients and Healthcare Professionals Have? A Qualitative Study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0137415
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137415
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0137415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.