Author
Listed:
- Jessica Lebenberg
- Alain Lalande
- Patrick Clarysse
- Irene Buvat
- Christopher Casta
- Alexandre Cochet
- Constantin Constantinidès
- Jean Cousty
- Alain de Cesare
- Stephanie Jehan-Besson
- Muriel Lefort
- Laurent Najman
- Elodie Roullot
- Laurent Sarry
- Christophe Tilmant
- Frederique Frouin
- Mireille Garreau
Abstract
This work aimed at combining different segmentation approaches to produce a robust and accurate segmentation result. Three to five segmentation results of the left ventricle were combined using the STAPLE algorithm and the reliability of the resulting segmentation was evaluated in comparison with the result of each individual segmentation method. This comparison was performed using a supervised approach based on a reference method. Then, we used an unsupervised statistical evaluation, the extended Regression Without Truth (eRWT) that ranks different methods according to their accuracy in estimating a specific biomarker in a population. The segmentation accuracy was evaluated by estimating six cardiac function parameters resulting from the left ventricle contour delineation using a public cardiac cine MRI database. Eight different segmentation methods, including three expert delineations and five automated methods, were considered, and sixteen combinations of the automated methods using STAPLE were investigated. The supervised and unsupervised evaluations demonstrated that in most cases, STAPLE results provided better estimates than individual automated segmentation methods. Overall, combining different automated segmentation methods improved the reliability of the segmentation result compared to that obtained using an individual method and could achieve the accuracy of an expert.
Suggested Citation
Jessica Lebenberg & Alain Lalande & Patrick Clarysse & Irene Buvat & Christopher Casta & Alexandre Cochet & Constantin Constantinidès & Jean Cousty & Alain de Cesare & Stephanie Jehan-Besson & Muriel , 2015.
"Improved Estimation of Cardiac Function Parameters Using a Combination of Independent Automated Segmentation Results in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0135715
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135715
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0135715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.