IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0133296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability of Objectively Measured Sedentary Time and Physical Activity in Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Eivind Aadland
  • Einar Ylvisåker

Abstract

Background: In adults, a minimum of 3–5 days of accelerometer monitoring is usually considered appropriate to obtain reliable estimates of physical activity (PA). However, a longer period of measurement might be needed to obtain reliable estimates of sedentary behavior (SED). The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of objectively assessed SED and PA in adults. Methods: Eighty-seven adult subjects (28 men; mean (standard deviation) age 31.3 (12.2) years; body mass index 23.7 (3.1) kg/m2) wore the GT3X+ accelerometer for 21 subsequent days, for which the reliability of different wear time criteria (8 to 12 h/day and 3 to 5 d/week) was explored. Variance partitioning along with the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula was used as the basis for determining intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICC) and the number of monitoring days needed (N) to achieve an ICC = 0.80. Week-by-week reliability was reported using ICC, Bland-Altman plots and absolute measures of agreement. Results: Seven-10 days of monitoring was needed to reliably assess overall- (axis 1 and vector magnitude (VM) counts per minute (CPM)) and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), 3–4 days was needed for light PA (LPA), whereas the number of days needed for SED depended on whether adjustments were made for wear time (6–8 days) or not (13–15 days). The week-by-week ICC was ≥0.70 for all variables, with limits of agreement being ±267.8 cpm for CPM, ±352.3 cpm for VM CPM, ±76.8 min/day for SED, ±57.8 min/day for LPA and ±43.8 min/day for MVPA, equal to 1.0–1.6 standard deviations, when adjustment was made for wear time. Conclusions: For most variables, more than one week of measurement was needed to achieve an ICC = 0.80. Correcting for wear time was crucial to reliably determine SED. Considerable week-by-week variability was found for all variables. Researchers need to be aware of substantial intra-individual variability in accelerometer-measurements.

Suggested Citation

  • Eivind Aadland & Einar Ylvisåker, 2015. "Reliability of Objectively Measured Sedentary Time and Physical Activity in Adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0133296
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133296
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133296&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0133296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charlotte L Edwardson & Trish Gorely & Melanie J Davies & Laura J Gray & Kamlesh Khunti & Emma G Wilmot & Thomas Yates & Stuart J H Biddle, 2012. "Association of Sedentary Behaviour with Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-5, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eivind Aadland & Lars Bo Andersen & Turid Skrede & Ulf Ekelund & Sigmund Alfred Anderssen & Geir Kåre Resaland, 2017. "Reproducibility of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time over two seasons in children; Comparing a day-by-day and a week-by-week approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harri Helajärvi & Tom Rosenström & Katja Pahkala & Mika Kähönen & Terho Lehtimäki & Olli J Heinonen & Mervi Oikonen & Tuija Tammelin & Jorma S A Viikari & Olli T Raitakari, 2014. "Exploring Causality between TV Viewing and Weight Change in Young and Middle-Aged Adults. The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Francisco J Amaro-Gahete & Guillermo Sanchez-Delgado & Juan M A Alcantara & Borja Martinez-Tellez & Francisco M Acosta & Elisa Merchan-Ramirez & Marie Löf & Idoia Labayen & Jonatan R. Ruiz, 2019. "Energy expenditure differences across lying, sitting, and standing positions in young healthy adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Dong Shen & Weidong Mao & Tao Liu & Qingfeng Lin & Xiangdong Lu & Qiong Wang & Feng Lin & Ulf Ekelund & Katrien Wijndaele, 2014. "Sedentary Behavior and Incident Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-9, August.
    4. Sujin Kim & Juhwan Oh & Jongho Heo & Hwa-Young Lee & Jong-Koo Lee & S V Subramanian & Daehee Kang, 2018. "Socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of biomarkers of cardio-metabolic disease in South Korea: Comparison of the Health Examinees Study to a nationally representative survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Georgina E Crichton & Ala'a Alkerwi, 2014. "Association of Sedentary Behavior Time with Ideal Cardiovascular Health: The ORISCAV-LUX Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, June.
    6. Leandro Fornias Machado de Rezende & Maurício Rodrigues Lopes & Juan Pablo Rey-López & Victor Keihan Rodrigues Matsudo & Olinda do Carmo Luiz, 2014. "Sedentary Behavior and Health Outcomes: An Overview of Systematic Reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-7, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0133296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.