IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0133002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex Differences in Clinical Features of Early, Treated Parkinson’s Disease

Author

Listed:
  • Erika F Augustine
  • Adriana Pérez
  • Rohit Dhall
  • Chizoba C Umeh
  • Aleksandar Videnovic
  • Franca Cambi
  • Anne-Marie A Wills
  • Jordan J Elm
  • Richard M Zweig
  • Lisa M Shulman
  • Martha A Nance
  • Jacquelyn Bainbridge
  • Oksana Suchowersky

Abstract

Introduction: To improve our understanding of sex differences in the clinical characteristics of Parkinson’s Disease, we sought to examine differences in the clinical features and disease severity of men and women with early treated Parkinson’s Disease (PD) enrolled in a large-scale clinical trial. Methods: Analysis was performed of baseline data from the National Institutes of Health Exploratory Trials in Parkinson’s Disease (NET-PD) Long-term Study-1, a randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 10 grams of oral creatine/day in individuals with early, treated PD. We compared mean age at symptom onset, age at PD diagnosis, and age at randomization between men and women using t-test statistics. Sex differences in clinical features were evaluated, including: symptoms at diagnosis (motor) and symptoms at randomization (motor, non-motor, and daily functioning). Results: 1,741 participants were enrolled (62.5% male). No differences were detected in mean age at PD onset, age at PD diagnosis, age at randomization, motor symptoms, or daily functioning between men and women. Differences in non-motor symptoms were observed, with women demonstrating better performance compared to men on SCOPA-COG (Z = 5.064, p

Suggested Citation

  • Erika F Augustine & Adriana Pérez & Rohit Dhall & Chizoba C Umeh & Aleksandar Videnovic & Franca Cambi & Anne-Marie A Wills & Jordan J Elm & Richard M Zweig & Lisa M Shulman & Martha A Nance & Jacquel, 2015. "Sex Differences in Clinical Features of Early, Treated Parkinson’s Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0133002
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133002&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0133002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jia-Hung Chen & Chien-Tai Hong & Dean Wu & Wen-Chou Chi & Chia-Feng Yen & Hua-Fang Liao & Lung Chan & Tsan-Hon Liou, 2019. "Dementia-Related Functional Disability in Moderate to Advanced Parkinson’s Disease: Assessment Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-10, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0133002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.