IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0130732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Documenting Differences between Early Stone Age Flake Production Systems: An Experimental Model and Archaeological Verification

Author

Listed:
  • Darya Presnyakova
  • Will Archer
  • David R Braun
  • Wesley Flear

Abstract

This study investigates morphological differences between flakes produced via “core and flake” technologies and those resulting from bifacial shaping strategies. We investigate systematic variation between two technological groups of flakes using experimentally produced assemblages, and then apply the experimental model to the Cutting 10 Mid -Pleistocene archaeological collection from Elandsfontein, South Africa. We argue that a specific set of independent variables—and their interactions—including external platform angle, platform depth, measures of thickness variance and flake curvature should distinguish between these two technological groups. The role of these variables in technological group separation was further investigated using the Generalized Linear Model as well as Linear Discriminant Analysis. The Discriminant model was used to classify archaeological flakes from the Cutting 10 locality in terms of their probability of association, within either experimentally developed technological group. The results indicate that the selected independent variables play a central role in separating core and flake from bifacial technologies. Thickness evenness and curvature had the greatest effect sizes in both the Generalized Linear and Discriminant models. Interestingly the interaction between thickness evenness and platform depth was significant and played an important role in influencing technological group membership. The identified interaction emphasizes the complexity in attempting to distinguish flake production strategies based on flake morphological attributes. The results of the discriminant function analysis demonstrate that the majority of flakes at the Cutting 10 locality were not associated with the production of the numerous Large Cutting Tools found at the site, which corresponds with previous suggestions regarding technological behaviors reflected in this assemblage.

Suggested Citation

  • Darya Presnyakova & Will Archer & David R Braun & Wesley Flear, 2015. "Documenting Differences between Early Stone Age Flake Production Systems: An Experimental Model and Archaeological Verification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0130732
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130732
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130732&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0130732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher J. Lepre & Hélène Roche & Dennis V. Kent & Sonia Harmand & Rhonda L. Quinn & Jean-Philippe Brugal & Pierre-Jean Texier & Arnaud Lenoble & Craig S. Feibel, 2011. "An earlier origin for the Acheulian," Nature, Nature, vol. 477(7362), pages 82-85, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Wang & Stephen J Lycett & Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel & Jennie J H Jin & Christopher J Bae, 2012. "Comparison of Handaxes from Bose Basin (China) and the Western Acheulean Indicates Convergence of Form, Not Cognitive Differences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7, April.
    2. repec:abr:oajaas:v:3:y:2020:i:1:p:322-328 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Daniel A. Lauer & A. Michelle Lawing & Rachel A. Short & Fredrick K. Manthi & Johannes Müller & Jason J. Head & Jenny L. McGuire, 2023. "Disruption of trait-environment relationships in African megafauna occurred in the middle Pleistocene," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Policarpo Sánchez-Yustos & Fernando Diez-Martín & Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo & Javier Duque & Cristina Fraile & Isabel Díaz & Sara de Francisco & Enrique Baquedano & Audax Mabulla, 2017. "The origin of the Acheulean. Techno-functional study of the FLK W lithic record (Olduvai, Tanzania)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Alastair J. M. Key & Ivan Jarić & David L. Roberts, 2021. "Modelling the end of the Acheulean at global and continental levels suggests widespread persistence into the Middle Palaeolithic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0130732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.