Author
Listed:
- Baligh R Yehia
- Alisa J Stephens-Shields
- John A Fleishman
- Stephen A Berry
- Allison L Agwu
- Joshua P Metlay
- Richard D Moore
- W Christopher Mathews
- Ank Nijhawan
- Richard Rutstein
- Aditya H Gaur
- Kelly A Gebo
- HIV Research Network
Abstract
Background: The HIV care continuum (diagnosis, linkage to care, retention in care, receipt of antiretroviral therapy (ART), viral suppression) has been used to identify opportunities for improving the delivery of HIV care. Continuum steps are typically calculated in a conditional manner, with the number of persons completing the prior step serving as the base population for the next step. This approach may underestimate the prevalence of viral suppression by excluding patients who are suppressed but do not meet standard definitions of retention in care. Understanding how retention in care and viral suppression interact and change over time may improve our ability to intervene on these steps in the continuum. Methods: We followed 17,140 patients at 11 U.S. HIV clinics between 2010-2012. For each calendar year, patients were classified into one of five categories: (1) retained/suppressed, (2) retained/not-suppressed, (3) not-retained/suppressed, (4) not-retained/not-suppressed, and (5) lost to follow-up (for calendar years 2011 and 2012 only). Retained individuals were those completing ≥2 HIV medical visits separated by ≥90 days in the year. Persons not retained completed ≥1 HIV medical visit during the year, but did not meet the retention definition. Persons lost to follow-up had no HIV medical visits in the year. HIV viral suppression was defined as HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL at the last measure in the year. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine the probability of patients’ transitioning between retention/suppression categories from 2010 to 2011 and 2010 to 2012, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, HIV risk factor, insurance status, CD4 count, and use of ART. Results: Overall, 65.8% of patients were retained/suppressed, 17.4% retained/not-suppressed, 10.0% not-retained/suppressed, and 6.8% not-retained/not-suppressed in 2010. 59.5% of patients maintained the same status in 2011 (kappa=0.458) and 53.3% maintained the same status in 2012 (kappa=0.437). Conclusions: Not counting patients not-retained/suppressed as virally suppressed, as is commonly done in the HIV care continuum, underestimated the proportion suppressed by 13%. Applying the care continuum in a longitudinal manner will enhance its utility.
Suggested Citation
Baligh R Yehia & Alisa J Stephens-Shields & John A Fleishman & Stephen A Berry & Allison L Agwu & Joshua P Metlay & Richard D Moore & W Christopher Mathews & Ank Nijhawan & Richard Rutstein & Aditya H, 2015.
"The HIV Care Continuum: Changes over Time in Retention in Care and Viral Suppression,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-10, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0129376
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129376
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Torian, L.V. & Xia, Q. & Wiewel, E.W., 2014.
"Retention in care and viral suppression among persons living with HIV/AIDS in New York City, 2006-2010,"
American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(9), pages 24-29.
- Gray, K.M. & Tang, T. & Shouse, L. & Li, J. & Mermin, J. & H. Irene Hall, 2013.
"Using the HIV surveillance system to monitor the national HIV/AIDS strategy,"
American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(1), pages 141-147.
- Yehia, B. & Frank, I., 2011.
"Battling AIDS in America: An evaluation of the national HIV/AIDS strategy,"
American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(9), pages 4-7.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0129376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.