IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0129180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Score to Predict 1-Year Mortality after Haemodialysis Initiation in Patients with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease under Predialysis Nephrology Care

Author

Listed:
  • Toshiki Doi
  • Suguru Yamamoto
  • Takatoshi Morinaga
  • Ken-ei Sada
  • Noriaki Kurita
  • Yoshihiro Onishi

Abstract

Background: Few risk scores are available for predicting mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing predialysis nephrology care. Here, we developed a risk score using predialysis nephrology practice data to predict 1-year mortality following the initiation of haemodialysis (HD) for CKD patients. Methods: This was a multicenter cohort study involving CKD patients who started HD between April 2006 and March 2011 at 21 institutions with nephrology care services. Patients who had not received predialysis nephrology care at an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of approximately 10 mL/min per 1.73 m2 were excluded. Twenty-nine candidate predictors were selected, and the final model for 1-year mortality was developed via multivariate logistic regression and was internally validated by a bootstrapping technique. Results: A total of 688 patients were enrolled, and 62 (9.0%) patients died within one year of HD initiation. The following variables were retained in the final model: eGFR, serum albumin, calcium, Charlson Comorbidity Index excluding diabetes and renal disease (modified CCI), performance status (PS), and usage of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). Their β-coefficients were transformed into integer scores: three points were assigned to modified CCI≥3 and PS 3–4; two to calcium>8.5 mg/dL, modified CCI 1–2, and no use of ESA; and one to albumin 7 mL/min per 1.73 m2, and PS 1–2. Predicted 1-year mortality risk was 2.5% (score 0–4), 5.5% (score 5–6), 15.2% (score 7–8), and 28.9% (score 9–12). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.79–0.89). Conclusions: We developed a simple 6-item risk score predicting 1-year mortality after the initiation of HD that might help nephrologists make a shared decision with patients and families regarding the initiation of HD.

Suggested Citation

  • Toshiki Doi & Suguru Yamamoto & Takatoshi Morinaga & Ken-ei Sada & Noriaki Kurita & Yoshihiro Onishi, 2015. "Risk Score to Predict 1-Year Mortality after Haemodialysis Initiation in Patients with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease under Predialysis Nephrology Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0129180
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129180
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129180&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0129180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merel van Diepen & Marielle A Schroijen & Olaf M Dekkers & Joris I Rotmans & Raymond T Krediet & Elisabeth W Boeschoten & Friedo W Dekker, 2014. "Predicting Mortality in Patients with Diabetes Starting Dialysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-7, March.
    2. Willi Sauerbrei, 1999. "The Use of Resampling Methods to Simplify Regression Models in Medical Statistics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 48(3), pages 313-329.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hapfelmeier Alexander & Hothorn Torsten & Riediger Carina & Ulm Kurt, 2014. "Estimation of a Predictor’s Importance by Random Forests When There Is Missing Data: RISK Prediction in Liver Surgery using Laboratory Data," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 165-183, November.
    2. Sauerbrei, W. & Meier-Hirmer, C. & Benner, A. & Royston, P., 2006. "Multivariable regression model building by using fractional polynomials: Description of SAS, STATA and R programs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(12), pages 3464-3485, August.
    3. Hapfelmeier, A. & Ulm, K., 2013. "A new variable selection approach using Random Forests," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 50-69.
    4. Patrick Royston & Willi Sauerbrei, 2009. "Bootstrap assessment of the stability of multivariable models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 9(4), pages 547-570, December.
    5. Patrick Royston & Willi Sauerbrei, 2007. "Multivariable modeling with cubic regression splines: A principled approach," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 7(1), pages 45-70, February.
    6. Dunkler, Daniela & Sauerbrei, Willi & Heinze, Georg, 2016. "Global, Parameterwise and Joint Shrinkage Factor Estimation," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 69(i08).
    7. Harald Binder & Willi Sauerbrei, 2009. "Stability analysis of an additive spline model for respiratory health data by using knot removal," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(5), pages 577-600, December.
    8. Simone P Rauh & Martijn W Heymans & Anitra D M Koopman & Giel Nijpels & Coen D Stehouwer & Barbara Thorand & Wolfgang Rathmann & Christa Meisinger & Annette Peters & Tonia de las Heras Gala & Charlott, 2017. "Predicting glycated hemoglobin levels in the non-diabetic general population: Development and validation of the DIRECT-DETECT prediction model - a DIRECT study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0129180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.