Author
Listed:
- Sujata Sapkota
- Jo-anne E Brien
- Jerry R Greenfield
- Parisa Aslani
Abstract
Background: Poor adherence to anti-diabetic medications contributes to suboptimal glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). A range of interventions have been developed to promote anti-diabetic medication adherence. However, there has been very little focus on the characteristics of these interventions and how effectively they address factors that predict non-adherence. In this systematic review we assessed the characteristics of interventions that aimed to promote adherence to anti-diabetic medications. Method: Using appropriate search terms in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), PUBmed, and PsychINFO (years 2000–2013), we identified 52 studies which met the inclusion criteria. Results: Forty-nine studies consisted of patient-level interventions, two provider-level interventions, and one consisted of both. Interventions were classified as educational (n = 7), behavioural (n = 3), affective, economic (n = 3) or multifaceted (a combination of the above; n = 40). One study consisted of two interventions. The review found that multifaceted interventions, addressing several non-adherence factors, were comparatively more effective in improving medication adherence and glycaemic target in patients with T2D than single strategies. However, interventions with similar components and those addressing similar non-adherence factors demonstrated mixed results, making it difficult to conclude on effective intervention strategies to promote adherence. Educational strategies have remained the most popular intervention strategy, followed by behavioural, with affective components becoming more common in recent years. Most of the interventions addressed patient-related (n = 35), condition-related (n = 31), and therapy-related (n = 20) factors as defined by the World Health Organization, while fewer addressed health care system (n = 5) and socio-economic-related factors (n = 13). Conclusion: There is a noticeable shift in the literature from using single to multifaceted intervention strategies addressing a range of factors impacting adherence to medications. However, research limitations, such as limited use of standardized methods and tools to measure adherence, lack of individually tailored adherence promoting strategies and variability in the interventions developed, reduce the ability to generalize the findings of the studies reviewed. Furthermore, this review highlights the need to develop multifaceted interventions which can be tailored to the individual patient’s needs over the duration of their diabetes management.
Suggested Citation
Sujata Sapkota & Jo-anne E Brien & Jerry R Greenfield & Parisa Aslani, 2015.
"A Systematic Review of Interventions Addressing Adherence to Anti-Diabetic Medications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes—Components of Interventions,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-30, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0128581
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128581
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Katharina E. Blankart & Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2020.
"Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?,"
Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 605-618, December.
- Elyssa Wiecek & Fernanda S Tonin & Andrea Torres-Robles & Shalom I Benrimoj & Fernando Fernandez-Llimos & Victoria Garcia-Cardenas, 2019.
"Temporal effectiveness of interventions to improve medication adherence: A network meta-analysis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
- Fatimah Alenazi & Daniel Bressington & Monika Shrestha & Monica Peddle & Richard Gray, 2021.
"Effectiveness of Adherence Therapy in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-12, April.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0128581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.