Author
Listed:
- Yu-Sheng Lin
- Tien-Hsing Chen
- Sheng-Ping Hung
- Dong Yi Chen
- Chun-Tai Mao
- Ming-Lung Tsai
- Shih-Tai Chang
- Chun-Chieh Wang
- Ming-Shien Wen
- Mien-Cheng Chen
Abstract
Background: Several risk factors for pacemaker (PM) related complications have been reported. However, no study has investigated the impact of lead characteristics on pacemaker-related complications. Methods and Results: Patients who received a new pacemaker implant from January 1997 to December 2011 were selected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database. This population was grouped according to the pacemaker lead characteristics in terms of fixation and insulation. The impact of the characteristics of leads on early heart perforation was analyzed by multivariable logistic regression analysis, while the impact of the lead characteristics on early and late infection and late heart perforation over a three-year period were analyzed using Cox regression. This study included 36,104 patients with a mean age of 73.4±12.5 years. In terms of both early and late heart perforations, there were no significant differences between groups across the different types of fixation and insulations. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, the pacemaker-related infection rate was significantly lower in the active fixation only group compared to either the both fixation (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07–0.80; P = 0.020) or the passive fixation group (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08–0.83; P = 0.023). Conclusions: There was no difference in heart perforation between active and passive fixation leads. Active fixation leads were associated with reduced risk of pacemaker-related infection.
Suggested Citation
Yu-Sheng Lin & Tien-Hsing Chen & Sheng-Ping Hung & Dong Yi Chen & Chun-Tai Mao & Ming-Lung Tsai & Shih-Tai Chang & Chun-Chieh Wang & Ming-Shien Wen & Mien-Cheng Chen, 2015.
"Impact of Pacemaker Lead Characteristics on Pacemaker Related Infection and Heart Perforation: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0128320
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128320
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0128320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.