IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0128095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experience Sampling-Based Personalized Feedback and Positive Affect: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Depressed Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica A Hartmann
  • Marieke Wichers
  • Claudia Menne-Lothmann
  • Ingrid Kramer
  • Wolfgang Viechtbauer
  • Frenk Peeters
  • Koen R J Schruers
  • Alex L van Bemmel
  • Inez Myin-Germeys
  • Philippe Delespaul
  • Jim van Os
  • Claudia J P Simons

Abstract

Objectives: Positive affect (PA) plays a crucial role in the development, course, and recovery of depression. Recently, we showed that a therapeutic application of the experience sampling method (ESM), consisting of feedback focusing on PA in daily life, was associated with a decrease in depressive symptoms. The present study investigated whether the experience of PA increased during the course of this intervention. Design: Multicentre parallel randomized controlled trial. An electronic random sequence generator was used to allocate treatments. Settings: University, two local mental health care institutions, one local hospital. Participants: 102 pharmacologically treated outpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder, randomized over three treatment arms. Intervention: Six weeks of ESM self-monitoring combined with weekly PA-focused feedback sessions (experimental group); six weeks of ESM self-monitoring combined with six weekly sessions without feedback (pseudo-experimental group); or treatment as usual (control group). Main outcome: The interaction between treatment allocation and time in predicting positive and negative affect (NA) was investigated in multilevel regression models. Results: 102 patients were randomized (mean age 48.0, SD 10.2) of which 81 finished the entire study protocol. All 102 patients were included in the analyses. The experimental group did not show a significant larger increase in momentary PA during or shortly after the intervention compared to the pseudo-experimental or control groups (χ2 (2) =0.33, p=.846). The pseudo-experimental group showed a larger decrease in NA compared to the control group (χ2 (1) =6.29, p=.012). Conclusion: PA-focused feedback did not significantly impact daily life PA during or shortly after the intervention. As the previously reported reduction in depressive symptoms associated with the feedback unveiled itself only after weeks, it is conceivable that the effects on daily life PA also evolve slowly and therefore were not captured by the experience sampling procedure immediately after treatment. Trial Registration: Trialregister.nl/trialreg/index.asp. NTR1974

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica A Hartmann & Marieke Wichers & Claudia Menne-Lothmann & Ingrid Kramer & Wolfgang Viechtbauer & Frenk Peeters & Koen R J Schruers & Alex L van Bemmel & Inez Myin-Germeys & Philippe Delespaul & , 2015. "Experience Sampling-Based Personalized Feedback and Positive Affect: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Depressed Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0128095
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128095
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128095&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0128095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0128095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.