IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0126760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Risk Stratification of Oral Leukoplakia with Exfoliative Cytology

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Liu
  • Jianying Li
  • Xiaoyong Liu
  • Xudong Liu
  • Waqaar Khawar
  • Xinyan Zhang
  • Fan Wang
  • Xiaoxin Chen
  • Zheng Sun

Abstract

Exfoliative cytology has been widely used for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Test outcome is reported as “negative”, “atypical” (defined as abnormal epithelial changes of uncertain diagnostic significance), and “positive” (defined as definitive cellular evidence of epithelial dysplasia or carcinoma). The major challenge is how to properly manage the “atypical” patients in order to diagnose OSCC early and prevent OSCC. In this study, we collected exfoliative cytology data, histopathology data, and clinical data of normal subjects (n=102), oral leukoplakia (OLK) patients (n=82), and OSCC patients (n=93), and developed a data analysis procedure for quantitative risk stratification of OLK patients. This procedure involving a step called expert-guided data transformation and reconstruction (EdTAR) which allows automatic data processing and reconstruction and reveals informative signals for subsequent risk stratification. Modern machine learning techniques were utilized to build statistical prediction models on the reconstructed data. Among the several models tested using resampling methods for parameter pruning and performance evaluation, Support Vector Machine (SVM) was found to be optimal with a high sensitivity (median>0.98) and specificity (median>0.99). With the SVM model, we constructed an oral cancer risk index (OCRI) which may potentially guide clinical follow-up of OLK patients. One OLK patient with an initial OCRI of 0.88 developed OSCC after 40 months of follow-up. In conclusion, we have developed a statistical method for qualitative risk stratification of OLK patients. This method may potentially improve cost-effectiveness of clinical follow-up of OLK patients, and help design clinical chemoprevention trial for high-risk populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Liu & Jianying Li & Xiaoyong Liu & Xudong Liu & Waqaar Khawar & Xinyan Zhang & Fan Wang & Xiaoxin Chen & Zheng Sun, 2015. "Quantitative Risk Stratification of Oral Leukoplakia with Exfoliative Cytology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0126760
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126760
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126760&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0126760?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chia-Min Chung & Chung-Chieh Hung & Chien-Hung Lee & Chi-Pin Lee & Ka-Wo Lee & Mu-Kuan Chen & Kun-Tu Yeh & Ying-Chin Ko, 2019. "Variants in FAT1 and COL9A1 genes in male population with or without substance use to assess the risk factors for oral malignancy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0126760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.