IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0126544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Function of Cancer Associated Genes Revealed by Modern Univariate and Multivariate Association Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Malka Gorfine
  • Boaz Goldstein
  • Alla Fishman
  • Ruth Heller
  • Yair Heller
  • Ayelet T Lamm

Abstract

Copy number variation (CNV) plays a role in pathogenesis of many human diseases, especially cancer. Several whole genome CNV association studies have been performed for the purpose of identifying cancer associated CNVs. Here we undertook a novel approach to whole genome CNV analysis, with the goal being identification of associations between CNV of different genes (CNV-CNV) across 60 human cancer cell lines. We hypothesize that these associations point to the roles of the associated genes in cancer, and can be indicators of their position in gene networks of cancer-driving processes. Recent studies show that gene associations are often non-linear and non-monotone. In order to obtain a more complete picture of all CNV associations, we performed omnibus univariate analysis by utilizing dCov, MIC, and HHG association tests, which are capable of detecting any type of association, including non-monotone relationships. For comparison we used Spearman and Pearson association tests, which detect only linear or monotone relationships. Application of dCov, MIC and HHG tests resulted in identification of twice as many associations compared to those found by Spearman and Pearson alone. Interestingly, most of the new associations were detected by the HHG test. Next, we utilized dCov's and HHG's ability to perform multivariate analysis. We tested for association between genes of unknown function and known cancer-related pathways. Our results indicate that multivariate analysis is much more effective than univariate analysis for the purpose of ascribing biological roles to genes of unknown function. We conclude that a combination of multivariate and univariate omnibus association tests can reveal significant information about gene networks of disease-driving processes. These methods can be applied to any large gene or pathway dataset, allowing more comprehensive analysis of biological processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Malka Gorfine & Boaz Goldstein & Alla Fishman & Ruth Heller & Yair Heller & Ayelet T Lamm, 2015. "Function of Cancer Associated Genes Revealed by Modern Univariate and Multivariate Association Tests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0126544
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126544
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126544&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0126544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy J. Aitman & Rong Dong & Timothy J. Vyse & Penny J. Norsworthy & Michelle D. Johnson & Jennifer Smith & Jonathan Mangion & Cheri Roberton-Lowe & Amy J. Marshall & Enrico Petretto & Matthew D. H, 2006. "Copy number polymorphism in Fcgr3 predisposes to glomerulonephritis in rats and humans," Nature, Nature, vol. 439(7078), pages 851-855, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathan E Wineinger & Hemant K Tiwari, 2012. "The Impact of Errors in Copy Number Variation Detection Algorithms on Association Results," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-5, April.
    2. Wonkuk Kim & Derek Gordon & Jonathan Sebat & Kenny Q Ye & Stephen J Finch, 2008. "Computing Power and Sample Size for Case-Control Association Studies with Copy Number Polymorphism: Application of Mixture-Based Likelihood Ratio Test," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-9, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0126544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.