Author
Listed:
- Matías Lopez-Rosenfeld
- Cecilia I Calero
- Diego Fernandez Slezak
- Gerry Garbulsky
- Mariano Bergman
- Marcos Trevisan
- Mariano Sigman
Abstract
There is a prevailing belief that interruptions using cellular phones during face to face interactions may affect severely how people relate and perceive each other. We set out to determine this cost quantitatively through an experiment performed in dyads, in a large audience in a TEDx event. One of the two participants (the speaker) narrates a story vividly. The listener is asked to deliberately ignore the speaker during part of the story (for instance, attending to their cell-phone). The speaker is not aware of this treatment. We show that total amount of attention is the major factor driving subjective beliefs about the story and the conversational partner. The effects are mostly independent on how attention is distributed in time. All social parameters of human communication are affected by attention time with a sole exception: the perceived emotion of the story. Interruptions during day-to-day communication between peers are extremely frequent. Our data should provide a note of caution, by indicating that they have a major effect on the perception people have about what they say (whether it is interesting or not . . .) and about the virtues of the people around them.
Suggested Citation
Matías Lopez-Rosenfeld & Cecilia I Calero & Diego Fernandez Slezak & Gerry Garbulsky & Mariano Bergman & Marcos Trevisan & Mariano Sigman, 2015.
"Neglect in Human Communication: Quantifying the Cost of Cell-Phone Interruptions in Face to Face Dialogs,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-9, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0125772
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125772
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0125772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.