IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0125048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method

Author

Listed:
  • Wang Weipeng
  • Liu Jianli
  • Zhao Bingzi
  • Zhang Jiabao
  • Li Xiaopeng
  • Yan Yifan

Abstract

Mathematical descriptions of classical particle size distribution (PSD) data are often used to estimate soil hydraulic properties. Laser diffraction methods (LDM) now provide more detailed PSD measurements, but deriving a function to characterize the entire range of particle sizes is a major challenge. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of eighteen PSD functions for fitting LDM data sets from a wide range of soil textures. These models include five lognormal models, five logistic models, four van Genuchten models, two Fredlund models, a logarithmic model, and an Andersson model. The fits were evaluated using Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), adjusted R2, and root-mean-square error (RMSE). The results indicated that the Fredlund models (FRED3 and FRED4) had the best performance for most of the soils studied, followed by one logistic growth function extension model (MLOG3) and three lognormal models (ONLG3, ORLG3, and SHCA3). The performance of most PSD models was better for soils with higher silt content and poorer for soils with higher clay and sand content. The FRED4 model best described the PSD of clay, silty clay, clay loam, silty clay loam, silty loam, loam, and sandy loam, whereas FRED3, MLOG3, ONLG3, ORLG3, and SHCA3 showed better performance for most soils studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang Weipeng & Liu Jianli & Zhao Bingzi & Zhang Jiabao & Li Xiaopeng & Yan Yifan, 2015. "Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0125048
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125048&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0125048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Fisher & Colin Aumann & Kohleth Chia & Nick O'Halloran & Subhash Chandra, 2017. "Adequacy of laser diffraction for soil particle size analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0125048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.