IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0124414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feature Selection for Wearable Smartphone-Based Human Activity Recognition with Able bodied, Elderly, and Stroke Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole A Capela
  • Edward D Lemaire
  • Natalie Baddour

Abstract

Human activity recognition (HAR), using wearable sensors, is a growing area with the potential to provide valuable information on patient mobility to rehabilitation specialists. Smartphones with accelerometer and gyroscope sensors are a convenient, minimally invasive, and low cost approach for mobility monitoring. HAR systems typically pre-process raw signals, segment the signals, and then extract features to be used in a classifier. Feature selection is a crucial step in the process to reduce potentially large data dimensionality and provide viable parameters to enable activity classification. Most HAR systems are customized to an individual research group, including a unique data set, classes, algorithms, and signal features. These data sets are obtained predominantly from able-bodied participants. In this paper, smartphone accelerometer and gyroscope sensor data were collected from populations that can benefit from human activity recognition: able-bodied, elderly, and stroke patients. Data from a consecutive sequence of 41 mobility tasks (18 different tasks) were collected for a total of 44 participants. Seventy-six signal features were calculated and subsets of these features were selected using three filter-based, classifier-independent, feature selection methods (Relief-F, Correlation-based Feature Selection, Fast Correlation Based Filter). The feature subsets were then evaluated using three generic classifiers (Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, j48 Decision Tree). Common features were identified for all three populations, although the stroke population subset had some differences from both able-bodied and elderly sets. Evaluation with the three classifiers showed that the feature subsets produced similar or better accuracies than classification with the entire feature set. Therefore, since these feature subsets are classifier-independent, they should be useful for developing and improving HAR systems across and within populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole A Capela & Edward D Lemaire & Natalie Baddour, 2015. "Feature Selection for Wearable Smartphone-Based Human Activity Recognition with Able bodied, Elderly, and Stroke Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0124414
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0124414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0124414&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0124414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiheng Zhang & Yongkang Wong & Mohan S Kankanhalli & Weidong Geng, 2019. "Hierarchical multi-view aggregation network for sensor-based human activity recognition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Tomasz Szot & Cezary Specht & Mariusz Specht & Pawel S Dabrowski, 2019. "Comparative analysis of positioning accuracy of Samsung Galaxy smartphones in stationary measurements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Pin-Wei Chen & Nathan A. Baune & Igor Zwir & Jiayu Wang & Victoria Swamidass & Alex W.K. Wong, 2021. "Measuring Activities of Daily Living in Stroke Patients with Motion Machine Learning Algorithms: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0124414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.