IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0123105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human and Machine Learning in Non-Markovian Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron Michael Clarke
  • Johannes Friedrich
  • Elisa M Tartaglia
  • Silvia Marchesotti
  • Walter Senn
  • Michael H Herzog

Abstract

Humans can learn under a wide variety of feedback conditions. Reinforcement learning (RL), where a series of rewarded decisions must be made, is a particularly important type of learning. Computational and behavioral studies of RL have focused mainly on Markovian decision processes, where the next state depends on only the current state and action. Little is known about non-Markovian decision making, where the next state depends on more than the current state and action. Learning is non-Markovian, for example, when there is no unique mapping between actions and feedback. We have produced a model based on spiking neurons that can handle these non-Markovian conditions by performing policy gradient descent [1]. Here, we examine the model’s performance and compare it with human learning and a Bayes optimal reference, which provides an upper-bound on performance. We find that in all cases, our population of spiking neurons model well-describes human performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron Michael Clarke & Johannes Friedrich & Elisa M Tartaglia & Silvia Marchesotti & Walter Senn & Michael H Herzog, 2015. "Human and Machine Learning in Non-Markovian Decision Making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0123105
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0123105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0123105&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0123105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0123105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.