Author
Listed:
- Thomas Kötter
- Bruno R da Costa
- Margrit Fässler
- Eva Blozik
- Klaus Linde
- Peter Jüni
- Stephan Reichenbach
- Martin Scherer
Abstract
Background: Metamizole is used to treat pain in many parts of the world. Information on the safety profile of metamizole is scarce; no conclusive summary of the literature exists. Objective: To determine whether metamizole is clinically safe compared to placebo and other analgesics. Methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and several clinical trial registries. We screened the reference lists of included trials and previous systematic reviews. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of metamizole, administered to adults in any form and for any indication, to other analgesics or to placebo. Two authors extracted data regarding trial design and size, indications for pain medication, patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and methodological characteristics. Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and dropouts were assessed. We conducted separate meta-analyses for each metamizole comparator, using standard inverse-variance random effects meta-analysis to pool the estimates across trials, reported as risk ratios (RRs). We calculated the DerSimonian and Laird variance estimate T2 to measure heterogeneity between trials. The pre-specified primary end point was any AE during the trial period. Results: Of the 696 potentially eligible trials, 79 trials including almost 4000 patients with short-term metamizole use of less than two weeks met our inclusion criteria. Fewer AEs were reported for metamizole compared to opioids, RR = 0.79 (confidence interval 0.79 to 0.96). We found no differences between metamizole and placebo, paracetamol and NSAIDs. Only a few SAEs were reported, with no difference between metamizole and other analgesics. No agranulocytosis or deaths were reported. Our results were limited by the mediocre overall quality of the reports. Conclusion: For short-term use in the hospital setting, metamizole seems to be a safe choice when compared to other widely used analgesics. High-quality, adequately sized trials assessing the intermediate- and long-term safety of metamizole are needed.
Suggested Citation
Thomas Kötter & Bruno R da Costa & Margrit Fässler & Eva Blozik & Klaus Linde & Peter Jüni & Stephan Reichenbach & Martin Scherer, 2015.
"Metamizole-Associated Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0122918
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122918
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Alex Junio Silva Cruz & Maria Auxiliadora Parreiras Martins & Victor Santos Batista & Henrique Pereira de Aguilar Penido & Jacqueline Silva Santos & Thiago Rezende dos Santos & Woosung Sohn & Lia Silv, 2023.
"Dental Pain Medication Prescriptions in Minas Gerais, Brazil (2011–2021): A Time-Series Analysis,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-11, September.
- Falk Hoffmann & Carsten Bantel & Frederik Tilmann von Rosen & Kathrin Jobski, 2020.
"Regional Differences in Prescribing Patterns of Metamizole in Germany Based on Data from 70 Million Persons,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-9, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0122918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.