Author
Listed:
- Janneke Berecki-Gisolf
- Vasoontara Yiengprugsawan
- Matthew Kelly
- Roderick McClure
- Sam-ang Seubsman
- Adrian Sleigh
- Thai Cohort Study Team
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of motorcycle to car transitioning and urbanisation on traffic injury rates in Thailand. Design: Analysis of two consecutive surveys of a large national cohort study. Setting: Thailand. Participants: The data derived from 57,154 Thai Cohort Study (TCS) participants who provided relevant data on both the 2005 and 2009 surveys. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Motorcycle and car traffic crash injury self-reported in 2009, with twelve months’ recall. Results: In 2009, 5608(10%) participants reported a traffic crash injury. Most crashes involved a motorcycle (74%). Car access increased and motorcycle use decreased between 2005 and 2009. Among those who used a motorcycle at both time points, traffic injury incidence was 2.8 times greater compared to those who did not use a motorcycle at either time point. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test longitudinal and cross sectional factors associated with traffic crash injury: in the adjusted model, cars were negatively and motorcycles positively associated with injury. Living in an urban area was not injury protective in the adjusted model of traffic crash injury. Conclusions: Ongoing urbanisation in Thailand can be expected to lead to further reductions in road traffic injuries based on transition from motorcycles to cars in urban areas. Cities, however, do not provide an intrinsically safer traffic environment. To accommodate a safe transition to car use in Thailand, traffic infrastructural changes anticipating the growing car density in urban areas is warranted.
Suggested Citation
Janneke Berecki-Gisolf & Vasoontara Yiengprugsawan & Matthew Kelly & Roderick McClure & Sam-ang Seubsman & Adrian Sleigh & Thai Cohort Study Team, 2015.
"The Impact of the Thai Motorcycle Transition on Road Traffic Injury: Thai Cohort Study Results,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0120617
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120617
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0120617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.