IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0119365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hysteresis in Audiovisual Synchrony Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Rémy Martin
  • Anne Kösem
  • Virginie van Wassenhove

Abstract

The effect of stimulation history on the perception of a current event can yield two opposite effects, namely: adaptation or hysteresis. The perception of the current event thus goes in the opposite or in the same direction as prior stimulation, respectively. In audiovisual (AV) synchrony perception, adaptation effects have primarily been reported. Here, we tested if perceptual hysteresis could also be observed over adaptation in AV timing perception by varying different experimental conditions. Participants were asked to judge the synchrony of the last (test) stimulus of an AV sequence with either constant or gradually changing AV intervals (constant and dynamic condition, respectively). The onset timing of the test stimulus could be cued or not (prospective vs. retrospective condition, respectively). We observed hysteretic effects for AV synchrony judgments in the retrospective condition that were independent of the constant or dynamic nature of the adapted stimuli; these effects disappeared in the prospective condition. The present findings suggest that knowing when to estimate a stimulus property has a crucial impact on perceptual simultaneity judgments. Our results extend beyond AV timing perception, and have strong implications regarding the comparative study of hysteresis and adaptation phenomena.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Rémy Martin & Anne Kösem & Virginie van Wassenhove, 2015. "Hysteresis in Audiovisual Synchrony Perception," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0119365
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119365
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119365&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0119365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott A Love & Karin Petrini & Adam Cheng & Frank E Pollick, 2013. "A Psychophysical Investigation of Differences between Synchrony and Temporal Order Judgments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Yoshiyuki Sato & Kazuyuki Aihara, 2011. "A Bayesian Model of Sensory Adaptation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-7, April.
    3. Yoichi Sugita & Yôiti Suzuki, 2003. "Implicit estimation of sound-arrival time," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6926), pages 911-911, February.
    4. Shinya Yamamoto & Makoto Miyazaki & Takayuki Iwano & Shigeru Kitazawa, 2012. "Bayesian Calibration of Simultaneity in Audiovisual Temporal Order Judgments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-9, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renan Schiavolin Recio & André Mascioli Cravo & Raphael Yokoingawa de Camargo & Virginie van Wassenhove, 2019. "Dissociating the sequential dependency of subjective temporal order from subjective simultaneity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Darren Rhodes & Massimiliano Di Luca, 2016. "Temporal Regularity of the Environment Drives Time Perception," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Sophie Smit & Anina N Rich & Regine Zopf, 2019. "Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Alex B Fine & T Florian Jaeger & Thomas A Farmer & Ting Qian, 2013. "Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0119365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.