IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0119074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Cluster Size Variability on Statistical Power in Cluster-Randomized Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen A Lauer
  • Ken P Kleinman
  • Nicholas G Reich

Abstract

The frequency of cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) in peer-reviewed literature has increased exponentially over the past two decades. CRTs are a valuable tool for studying interventions that cannot be effectively implemented or randomized at the individual level. However, some aspects of the design and analysis of data from CRTs are more complex than those for individually randomized controlled trials. One of the key components to designing a successful CRT is calculating the proper sample size (i.e. number of clusters) needed to attain an acceptable level of statistical power. In order to do this, a researcher must make assumptions about the value of several variables, including a fixed mean cluster size. In practice, cluster size can often vary dramatically. Few studies account for the effect of cluster size variation when assessing the statistical power for a given trial. We conducted a simulation study to investigate how the statistical power of CRTs changes with variable cluster sizes. In general, we observed that increases in cluster size variability lead to a decrease in power.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen A Lauer & Ken P Kleinman & Nicholas G Reich, 2015. "The Effect of Cluster Size Variability on Statistical Power in Cluster-Randomized Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0119074
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119074
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119074&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0119074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas G Reich & Jessica A Myers & Daniel Obeng & Aaron M Milstone & Trish M Perl, 2012. "Empirical Power and Sample Size Calculations for Cluster-Randomized and Cluster-Randomized Crossover Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jansen, Stefan & Nsabimana, Epaphrodite & Kagaba, Mediatrice & Mutabaruka, Jean & Rutembesa, Eugene & Slegh, Henny & Mihigo, Bonaventure & Mahwa, Aloys & Ruratotoye, Benoit & Haile, Zelalem, 2022. "A clustered randomized controlled trial to assess whether Living Peace Intervention (LPint) reduces domestic violence and its consequences among families of targeted men in Eastern Democratic Republic," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0119074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.