IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0114947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recalibration of the Limiting Antigen Avidity EIA to Determine Mean Duration of Recent Infection in Divergent HIV-1 Subtypes

Author

Listed:
  • Yen T Duong
  • Reshma Kassanjee
  • Alex Welte
  • Meade Morgan
  • Anindya De
  • Trudy Dobbs
  • Erin Rottinghaus
  • John Nkengasong
  • Marcel E Curlin
  • Chonticha Kittinunvorakoon
  • Boonyos Raengsakulrach
  • Michael Martin
  • Kachit Choopanya
  • Suphak Vanichseni
  • Yan Jiang
  • Maofeng Qiu
  • Haiying Yu
  • Yan Hao
  • Neha Shah
  • Linh-Vi Le
  • Andrea A Kim
  • Tuan Anh Nguyen
  • William Ampofo
  • Bharat S Parekh

Abstract

Background: Mean duration of recent infection (MDRI) and misclassification of long-term HIV-1 infections, as proportion false recent (PFR), are critical parameters for laboratory-based assays for estimating HIV-1 incidence. Recent review of the data by us and others indicated that MDRI of LAg-Avidity EIA estimated previously required recalibration. We present here results of recalibration efforts using >250 seroconversion panels and multiple statistical methods to ensure accuracy and consensus. Methods: A total of 2737 longitudinal specimens collected from 259 seroconverting individuals infected with diverse HIV-1 subtypes were tested with the LAg-Avidity EIA as previously described. Data were analyzed for determination of MDRI at ODn cutoffs of 1.0 to 2.0 using 7 statistical approaches and sub-analyzed by HIV-1 subtypes. In addition, 3740 specimens from individuals with infection >1 year, including 488 from patients with AIDS, were tested for PFR at varying cutoffs. Results: Using different statistical methods, MDRI values ranged from 88–94 days at cutoff ODn = 1.0 to 177–183 days at ODn = 2.0. The MDRI values were similar by different methods suggesting coherence of different approaches. Testing for misclassification among long-term infections indicated that overall PFRs were 0.6% to 2.5% at increasing cutoffs of 1.0 to 2.0, respectively. Balancing the need for a longer MDRI and smaller PFR (

Suggested Citation

  • Yen T Duong & Reshma Kassanjee & Alex Welte & Meade Morgan & Anindya De & Trudy Dobbs & Erin Rottinghaus & John Nkengasong & Marcel E Curlin & Chonticha Kittinunvorakoon & Boonyos Raengsakulrach & Mic, 2015. "Recalibration of the Limiting Antigen Avidity EIA to Determine Mean Duration of Recent Infection in Divergent HIV-1 Subtypes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0114947
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114947
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114947&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0114947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joseph B Sempa & Alex Welte & Michael P Busch & Jake Hall & Dylan Hampton & Shelley N Facente & Sheila M Keating & Kara Marson & Neil Parkin & Christopher D Pilcher & Gary Murphy & Eduard Grebe & on b, 2019. "Performance comparison of the Maxim and Sedia Limiting Antigen Avidity assays for HIV incidence surveillance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0114947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.