IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0113753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Associated with Long-Term Use of Hypnotics among Patients with Chronic Insomnia

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshikazu Takaesu
  • Yoko Komada
  • Shoichi Asaoka
  • Tatsuo Kagimura
  • Yuichi Inoue

Abstract

This study investigated factors associated with long-term use of benzodiazepines (BZDs) or benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BzRAs) as hypnotics in patients with chronic insomnia. Consecutive patients (n = 140) with chronic insomnia were enrolled in this study (68 men and 72 women; mean age, 53.8±10.8 years). All patients filled out a self-assessment questionnaire asking clinical descriptive variables at the baseline of the treatment period; patients received the usual dose of a single type of BZD or BzRA. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale were self-assessed at the baseline, and the former was re-evaluated at the time of cessation of medication or at the end of the 6-month treatment period. The PSQI included the following sub-items: evaluating sleep quality (C1), sleep latency (C2), sleep duration (C3), habitual sleep efficiency (C4), frequency of sleep disturbance (C5), use of sleeping medication (C6), and daytime dysfunction (C7). Among the patients, 54.6% needed to continue hypnotics for a 6-month treatment period. Logistic regression analysis revealed that, among descriptive variables, only the PSQI score appeared as a significant factor associated with long-term use {odds ratio (OR) = 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.0–4.0}. The receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis identified that the cut-off PSQI total score at the baseline for predicting long-term use was estimated at 13.5 points (area under the curve = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.8–0.92). Among the sub-items of PSQI, the increases in C1: (OR = 8.4, 95% CI = 2.4–30.0), C3: (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.1–11.5), C4: (OR = 11.1, 95% CI = 3.6–33.9), and C6: (OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.9–6.2) scores were associated with long-term use. This study revealed that a high PSQI score at the baseline, particularly in the sub-items relating to sleep maintenance disturbance, is predictive of long-term hypnotic treatment. Our results imply the limitation of the effectiveness of hypnotic treatment alone for chronic insomnia.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshikazu Takaesu & Yoko Komada & Shoichi Asaoka & Tatsuo Kagimura & Yuichi Inoue, 2014. "Factors Associated with Long-Term Use of Hypnotics among Patients with Chronic Insomnia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-7, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0113753
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0113753
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0113753&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0113753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan-yuan Ye & Yuan-feng Zhang & Jia Chen & Juan Liu & Xun-jun Li & Ya-zhen Liu & Ying Lang & Ling Lin & Xin-Ju Yang & Xiao-Jiang Jiang, 2015. "Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (ICBT-i) Improves Comorbid Anxiety and Depression—A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0113753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.