IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0112577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wenzhi Wang
  • Yumin Hu
  • Peiou Lu
  • Yingci Li
  • Yunfu Chen
  • Mohan Tian
  • Lijuan Yu

Abstract

Object: The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) for screening brain tumors, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data on the diagnostic performance of MRS. Methods: The PubMed and PHMC databases were systematically searched for relevant studies up to December 2013. The sensitivities and specificities of MRS in individual studies were calculated and the pooled diagnostic accuracies, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were assessed under a fixed-effects model. Results: Twenty-four studies were included, comprising a total of 1013 participants. Overall, no heterogeneity of diagnostic effects was observed between studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRS were 80.05% (95% CI = 75.97%–83.59%) and 78.46% (95% CI: 73.40%–82.78%), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.78. Stratified meta analysis showed higher sensitivity and specificity in child than adult. CSI had higher sensitivity and SV had higher specificity. Higher sensitivity and specificity were obtained in short TE value. Conclusion: Although the qualities of the studies included in the meta-analysis were moderate, current evidence suggests that MRS may be a valuable adjunct to magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing brain tumors, but requires selection of suitable technique and TE value.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenzhi Wang & Yumin Hu & Peiou Lu & Yingci Li & Yunfu Chen & Mohan Tian & Lijuan Yu, 2014. "Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0112577
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112577
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112577&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0112577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongshuai Jiang & Ruijie Zhang & Jiajia Zheng & Panpan Liu & Guoping Tang & Hongchao Lv & Lanying Zhang & Zhenwei Shang & Yuanbo Zhan & Wenhua Lv & Miao Shi & Ruimin Zhang, 2012. "Meta-Analysis of 125 Rheumatoid Arthritis-Related Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Studied in the Past Two Decades," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Kristian Thorlund & Georgina Imberger & Bradley C Johnston & Michael Walsh & Tahany Awad & Lehana Thabane & Christian Gluud & P J Devereaux & Jørn Wetterslev, 2012. "Evolution of Heterogeneity (I2) Estimates and Their 95% Confidence Intervals in Large Meta-Analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-8, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camilo Germán Alberto Pérez Chaparro & Philipp Zech & Felipe Schuch & Bernd Wolfarth & Michael Rapp & Andreas Heiβel, 2018. "Effects of aerobic and resistance exercise alone or combined on strength and hormone outcomes for people living with HIV. A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Xun Li & Lin Shen & Hongzhuan Tan, 2014. "Polymorphisms and Plasma Level of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta 1 and Risk for Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-8, May.
    3. Anaïs Besson & Alice Tarpin & Valentin Flaudias & Georges Brousse & Catherine Laporte & Amanda Benson & Valentin Navel & Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois & Frédéric Dutheil, 2021. "Smoking Prevalence among Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-58, December.
    4. Augusteijn, Hilde & van Aert, Robbie Cornelis Maria & van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., 2017. "The Effect of Publication Bias on the Assessment of Heterogeneity," OSF Preprints gv25c, Center for Open Science.
    5. Antonia E Dalziel & Steven Delean & Sarah Heinrich & Phillip Cassey, 2016. "Persistence of Low Pathogenic Influenza A Virus in Water: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Nahia Idoiaga Mondragon & Idoia Legorburu Fernandez & Naiara Ozamiz-Etxebarria & Beatriz Villagrasa & Javier Santabárbara, 2023. "PTSD (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder) in Teachers: A Mini Meta-Analysis during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Edward R. Maguire & Cody W. Telep & Thomas Abt & Ericka Adams, 2024. "PROTOCOL: Street outreach conflict mediation programs for reducing violence," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0112577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.