Measuring What Latent Fingerprint Examiners Consider Sufficient Information for Individualization Determinations
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110179
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- C. Neumann & I. W. Evett & J. Skerrett, 2012. "Quantifying the weight of evidence from a forensic fingerprint comparison: a new paradigm," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 175(2), pages 371-415, April.
- Bradford T Ulery & R Austin Hicklin & JoAnn Buscaglia & Maria Antonia Roberts, 2012. "Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-12, March.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Zhihui Li & Yao Liu & Xiyuan Hu & Guiqiang Wang, 2022. "A new uniform framework of source attribution in forensic science," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
- Joubert, Johan W. & Meintjes, Sumarie, 2015. "Repeatability & reproducibility: Implications of using GPS data for freight activity chains," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 81-92.
- Jan Hannig & Hari Iyer, 2022. "Testing for calibration discrepancy of reported likelihood ratios in forensic science," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 267-301, January.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0110179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.