IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0109353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Acceptance and Subsequent Uptake of the HPV Vaccine in a Cohort in Eldoret, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Heleen Vermandere
  • Violet Naanyu
  • Hillary Mabeya
  • Davy Vanden Broeck
  • Kristien Michielsen
  • Olivier Degomme

Abstract

The development of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines provides new opportunities in the fight against cervical cancer. Many acceptability studies have revealed high interest in these vaccines, but acceptance is only a precursor of behavior, and many factors, at personal, community and provider level, may inhibit the translation of willingness to vaccinate into actual uptake. Through a longitudinal study in Eldoret, Kenya, HPV vaccine acceptability was measured before a vaccination program (n = 287) and vaccine uptake, as reported by mothers, once the program was finished (n = 256). In between baseline and follow-up, a pilot HPV vaccination program was implemented via the GARDASIL Access Program, in which parents could have their daughter vaccinated for free at the referral hospital. The program was promoted at schools: Health staff informed teachers who were then asked to inform students and parents. Even though baseline acceptance was very high (88.1%), only 31.1% of the women reported at follow-up that their daughter had been vaccinated. The vaccine was declined by 17.7%, while another 51.2% had wanted the vaccination but were obstructed by practical barriers. Being well-informed about the program and baseline awareness of cervical cancer were independently associated with vaccine uptake, while baseline acceptance was correlated in bivariate analysis. Side effects were of great concern, even among those whose daughter was vaccinated. Possible partner disapproval lowered acceptance at baseline, and women indeed reported at follow-up that they had encountered his opposition. In Kenya, women prove to be very willing to have their daughter vaccinated against cervical cancer. However, in this study, uptake was more determined by program awareness than by HPV vaccine acceptance. School-based vaccination might improve coverage since it reduces operational problems for parents. In addition, future HPV vaccination campaigns should address concerns about side effects, targeting men and women, given both their involvement in HPV vaccination decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Heleen Vermandere & Violet Naanyu & Hillary Mabeya & Davy Vanden Broeck & Kristien Michielsen & Olivier Degomme, 2014. "Determinants of Acceptance and Subsequent Uptake of the HPV Vaccine in a Cohort in Eldoret, Kenya," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0109353
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109353
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109353&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0109353?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reiter, P.L. & McRee, A.-L. & Pepper, J.K. & Gilkey, M.B. & Galbraith, K.V. & Brewer, N.T., 2013. "Longitudinal predictors of human papillomavirus vaccination among a national sample of adolescent males," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(8), pages 1419-1427.
    2. Wigle, Jannah & Coast, Ernestina & Watson-Jones, Deborah, 2013. "Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine implementation in low andmiddle-income countries (LMICs): health system experiences and prospects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 50582, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Asare & Peter Agyei-Baffour & Beth A. Lanning & Alex Barimah Owusu & Mary E. Commeh & Kathileen Boozer & Adofo Koranteng & Lori A. Spies & Jane R. Montealegre & Electra D. Paskett, 2020. "Multi-Theory Model and Predictors of Likelihood of Accepting the Series of HPV Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Study among Ghanaian Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Viens, Laura J. & Clouston, Sean & Messina, Catherine R., 2016. "Women's autonomy and cervical cancer screening in the Lesotho Demographic and Health Survey 2009," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 23-30.
    3. Gilkey, Melissa B. & Grabert, Brigid K. & Malo, Teri L. & Hall, Megan E. & Brewer, Noel T., 2020. "Physicians’ rhetorical strategies for motivating HPV vaccination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Moss, Jennifer L. & Reiter, Paul L. & Rimer, Barbara K. & Brewer, Noel T., 2016. "Collaborative patient-provider communication and uptake of adolescent vaccines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 100-107.
    5. Yuko Takahashi & Haruka Nishida & Takayuki Ichinose & Yuko Miyagawa & Koichiro Kido & Haruko Hiraike & Hirono Ishikawa & Kazunori Nagasaka, 2022. "Effect of Different Educational Interventions on Knowledge of HPV Vaccination and Cervical Cancer among Young Women: A Preliminary Report," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, April.
    6. Jaime L Taylor & Greg D Zimet & Kelly L Donahue & Andreia B Alexander & Marcia L Shew & Nathan W Stupiansky, 2014. "Vaccinating Sons against HPV: Results from a U.S. National Survey of Parents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0109353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.