IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0108898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Abiotic Preferences of Macroinvertebrates in Tropical River Basins

Author

Listed:
  • Gert Everaert
  • Jan De Neve
  • Pieter Boets
  • Luis Dominguez-Granda
  • Seid Tiku Mereta
  • Argaw Ambelu
  • Thu Huong Hoang
  • Peter L M Goethals
  • Olivier Thas

Abstract

We assessed and compared abiotic preferences of aquatic macroinvertebrates in three river basins located in Ecuador, Ethiopia and Vietnam. Upon using logistic regression models we analyzed the relationship between the probability of occurrence of five macroinvertebrate families, ranging from pollution tolerant to pollution sensitive, (Chironomidae, Baetidae, Hydroptilidae, Libellulidae and Leptophlebiidae) and physical-chemical water quality conditions. Within the investigated physical-chemical ranges, nine out of twenty-five interaction effects were significant. Our analyses suggested river basin dependent associations between the macroinvertebrate families and the corresponding physical-chemical conditions. It was found that pollution tolerant families showed no clear abiotic preference and occurred at most sampling locations, i.e. Chironomidae were present in 91%, 84% and 93% of the samples taken in Ecuador, Ethiopia and Vietnam. Pollution sensitive families were strongly associated with dissolved oxygen and stream velocity, e.g. Leptophlebiidae were only present in 48%, 2% and 18% of the samples in Ecuador, Ethiopia and Vietnam. Despite some limitations in the study design, we concluded that associations between macroinvertebrates and abiotic conditions can be river basin-specific and hence are not automatically transferable across river basins in the tropics.

Suggested Citation

  • Gert Everaert & Jan De Neve & Pieter Boets & Luis Dominguez-Granda & Seid Tiku Mereta & Argaw Ambelu & Thu Huong Hoang & Peter L M Goethals & Olivier Thas, 2014. "Comparison of the Abiotic Preferences of Macroinvertebrates in Tropical River Basins," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0108898
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108898
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108898&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0108898?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Forio, Marie Anne Eurie & Landuyt, Dries & Bennetsen, Elina & Lock, Koen & Nguyen, Thi Hanh Tien & Ambarita, Minar Naomi Damanik & Musonge, Peace Liz Sasha & Boets, Pieter & Everaert, Gert & Dominguez, 2015. "Bayesian belief network models to analyse and predict ecological water quality in rivers," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 222-238.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0108898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.